Valid arguments must include facts and supporting documentation in order to strengthen the validity. If not, then the argument can be challenged.
A valid argument is certainly stronger than an invalid argument. but an argument can be valid and still be relatively weak. Validity and strength are not the same, although they are both good features for an argument to have.
An argument that is strong, sound, and valid is a cogent one.
An argument that is weak is, by definition, uncogent....
For an argument to be valid, it means that if the premises of the argument are true, then the conclusion must be true. Validity has to do with the form of the argument. If one or more of the premises are not true, that does not mean the argument isn't valid. Soundness means that the argument is valid, and all of it's premises are true. It's a little redundant to say "both valid and sound", because if your argument is sound, then it must be valid. It is important for an argument to be not just valid, but also sound, in order for it to be convincing.
No, but it can be unsound and valid.
Yes, a valid argument can still be weak if the premises provided are not strong or relevant enough to support the conclusion. Validity refers to the logical structure of an argument, while the strength of an argument refers to the quality and persuasiveness of the premises.
Valid arguments are not described as strong or weak. Validity refers to the logical structure of an argument - if the premises logically lead to the conclusion. An argument can be valid but still weak if the premises are not well-supported or sound.
A valid argument is certainly stronger than an invalid argument. but an argument can be valid and still be relatively weak. Validity and strength are not the same, although they are both good features for an argument to have.
No, arguments can either be strong or weak, however, a valid argument would be considered a sound argument. The opposite would be an invalid argument.
No, arguments can either be strong or weak, however, a valid argument would be considered a sound argument. The opposite would be an invalid argument.
A strong argument is one that is logically sound, supported by evidence and reasoning, and addresses counterarguments effectively. A weak argument lacks evidence, has logical fallacies, and relies on emotional appeals rather than facts.
An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. This means that if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. An argument is strong if the premises provide good support for the conclusion, making it likely to be true.
You will need a valid driver's license for identification.
An inductively strong argument is one where the premises provide good support for the conclusion, even though it is possible for the conclusion to be false. When an inductively strong argument has true premises, it is considered valid because the reasoning is sound and the conclusion is likely to be true based on the evidence provided.
A valid argument is one in which the truth of the premises guarantees the truth of its conclusion. An invalid argument is one in which the truth of the premises does not guarantee the truth of the conclusion. In invalid arguments, the conclusion does not follow with strict necessity from the premises, even though it is claimed to.
An argument that is strong, sound, and valid is a cogent one.
Evaluating Arguments QuizResults Reporter Out of 7 questions, you answered 7 correctly with a final grade of 100% 7 correct (100%) 0 incorrect (0%) 0 unanswered (0%) Your Results:The correct answer for each question is indicated by a . 1 CORRECT It's no use going on about whether this law is just. It was passed democratically. A) Valid B) Strong C) Can't be made either valid or strong Feedback: The correct answer is B. The assumed premise, Most laws that were passed democratically are just, makes the argument strong. The premise needed for a valid argument, "All democratically passed laws are just," is not as plausible. 2 CORRECT How can you be so critical of Pride and Prejudice? You never read it. A) Valid B) Strong C) Can't be made either valid or strong Feedback: The correct answer is A. The assumed premise, You are not justified in being critical of any book you have not read, is plausible and makes the argument valid. 3 CORRECT I wouldn't call her reliable. She was late with her last rent check. A) Valid B) Strong C) Can't be made either valid or strong Feedback: No assumed premise can make the argument either strong or valid. The weakest possible assumption, "If she was late with her rent check last month, she probably isn't reliable," is far too implausible. 4 CORRECT It's not safe to let Dave drive you home. He just had a furious argument with his boss. A) Valid B) Strong C) Can't be made either valid or strong Feedback: The correct answer is B. The assumed premise, When Dave has just had a furious argument, it's usually not safe to let him drive, makes this a strong argument. It isn't plausible to assume (as you'd have to for a valid argument) that Dave is an unsafe driver every time he's had a furious argument. 5 CORRECT Look, it's snowing. The air will be warmer today. A) Valid B) Strong C) Can't be made either valid or strong Feedback: The correct answer is B. The assumed premise, When it is snowing, the air becomes warmer, makes this a strong argument. 6 CORRECT We didn't miss the bus. It isn't 8:04 yet. A) Valid B) Strong C) Can't be made either valid or strong Feedback: The correct answer is B. The assumed premise, If it isn't 8:04, the bus probably has not come yet, makes the argument strong. 7 CORRECT That isn't art. A child could do it. A) Valid B) Strong C) Can't be made either valid or strong Feedback: No assumed premise can make the argument either strong or valid. The weakest possibility, "Very few children could make art," is too vague to be plausible.