Not terribly effectively. Rightsholders need to be aware of what they control, and act quickly when they find unlicensed and unfair uses. More proactive types of control, such as DRM, prevent even licensed and/or fair uses, and are universally unpopular, as well as eventually ineffective.
Yes; it is controlled by Warner.
The game Monopoly is controlled by Hasbro.
The song itself is controlled by Mushroom Music, and administered by Universal. The recording would be controlled by the label.
The song is controlled by Jobete, and the Captain and Tennille recording is controlled by A&M.
The song itself is controlled by Sony/ATV Tree; sound recordings would be controlled by their particular labels.
Rights are likely still controlled by the BBC.
It is controlled by Capcom, and is protected for 95 years after publication.
No; copyright seems to be controlled by Howard's grandchildren.
The song itself is controlled by Music of the West, a division of Songwriters Guild of America. Each recording may have its own copyright.
In the case of a work-made-for-hire, the copyright would be controlled by the entity that caused the work to be created, rather than the creator. A photographer under contract to a magazine, for example, would not have copyright for those photos.
It is controlled by Gene Autry's Western Music Publishing Company.
Depending on the photographer's contract, copyright may be controlled by the photographer personally, or by the company he or she was working for (such as a magazine). Photographic rights are some of the hardest to track.