Yes, although the matter would likely be incompetence rather than malpractice. In the US a lawsuit can be inititated under almost any circumstances. The main factor to consider before filing suit is if there are valid grounds to file and enough substantiated evidence to prove the plaintiff's claim. The more "hard" evidence the plaintiff has the better the chance of winning any type of suit.
Yes, but proving incompetence/misconduct is often difficult especially when it relates to legal representation. Anyone considering filing a lawsuit for any reason should consider all the aspects before taking action. The first thing of course is whether or not the suit is viable and if there is a reasonable chance for the plaintiff to prevail.
You can sue a lawyer for malpractice. To establish a malpractice claim, in most states you will have to show that there was an attorney-client relationship, that the attorney acted negligently, and that the attorney's negligence was the proximate cause of some harm.
To prove negligence, you will normally have to show something more than just that, in hindsight, the attorney's good faith strategies and judgments were not the best. A good example of negligence would be if the attorney missed a clear and important deadline which caused your case to be thrown out.
You can sue for negligence or fraud if it was intentional. However, if it is the opposing party's counsel who violated the Rules of Professional conduct you cannot sue for malpractice.
Yes. Typically there are three instances in which you can sue an attorney for malpractice: negligence, breach of fiducuary duty, breach of contract. And like any lawsuit you need to prove the elements of your claim in order to prevail which requires a showing of duty, breach, causation, and damages.
A defense lawyer can sue for malpractice if the subject is breaking the code and conduct of of proper business ettiquette. If the company or individual is in the wrong a malpractice suit can be sought.
No.
Attorneys require lawyer malpractice insurance to protect them from lawsuits enacted by their clients. If a lawyer does what a client deems to be an insufficient or substandard job, or feels that the lawyer did not represent them properly, the client has the right to sue the lawyer. Because of this, lawyers often invest in malpractice insurance to protect themselves in case a client wishes to enact a lawsuit against them and their work.
It is advisable to consult with a lawyer to assess the legal options available to you in suing your current lawyer for the delays in your Avandia case. A lawyer can help you navigate the process, determine if there are grounds for a lawsuit, and guide you through the necessary steps to seek appropriate compensation for the delays you have experienced.
A very good one. Search for one that specializes in malpractice.
In the book can you sue your parents for malpractice Melissa was dating mike
malpractice lawyer
If you have some sort of proof, possibly. This is a question for a medical malpractice lawyer.
You will need to find a malpractice lawyer who can sue a doctor for drugs given in the hospital. The lawyer will ask for an autopsy to be performed on the deceased.
A lawyer malpractice case starts with a client unhappy with the results. The first step in analyzing whether legal malpractice has occurred is for a lawyer to learn the reason for the attorney malpractice. The analysis of how the bad result occurred requires a review of the client's entire file. That usually requires the client to retrieve his or her file from the lawyer. It also requires that an expert lawyer consult on the standard of care applicable to your matter. Why is this important? Because most cases of legal malpractice require you to prove that had the lawyer not been negligent your results would have been better. In most cases an expert lawyer is hired to testify about the standard of care, without which you cannot prove lawyer negligence. The standard of care is what a reasonable lawyer should do under the circumstances of the representation. Basically, it means a lawyer should be competent, diligent, and loyal. A lawyer may be disloyal or act with a conflict of interest. These acts of an attorney are known as breach of fiduciary duty. This type of legal malpractice can cause you financial harm or damages. Usually the damages are pecuniary or economic only. Lawyer malpractice cases usually do not provide for compensation damages for stress, pain and suffering. If your case for malpractice involves an underlying case for bodily injury and pain and suffering is a component for that lost claim, then you may sue to obtain those lost damages. In some circumstances a lawyer may be liable to non-clients. In Arizona a claim for attorney malpractice based on negligence and breach of fiduciary duty must be filed within 2 years of you learning that your financial damages were caused by lawyer negligence or breach of fiduciary duty. Check with a lawyer in your state about the Statute of Limitations applicable to lawyer malpractice Suing a lawyer requires both knowledge of the substantive area of the law involving the malpractice and knowledge of how to pursue a claim for lawyer malpractice.
You can just about anybody for anything these days... its just a matter of whether you win or lose the case.
Maybe. Talk to a lawyer who specializes in medical malpractice.
No, but you might be able to sue a banker.
Doctors, accountants, architects, engineers, and other professionals who provide services can be sued for malpractice if they fail to meet the standard of care expected in their field, resulting in harm to their clients or patients.