yes i know one
Not at all.It is impossible. if it is true that a n evil act has good consequence there is no evil act exists.An evil act will always consequence a bad and evil end.
Good People in Times of Evil was created on 2000-11-10.
well, everyone does evil in their lifetime--it's in our nature. A person can be a good person because you trust them, they are virtuous, haven't gone to jail, you know, just a good dude. But that good dude can mess up, he can get really angry, and do something he'll regret later. A big difference between good and evil people is that good people have a conscience, and regret the bad things they did. Evil people do bad things to others because they enjoy it, and don't regret it later.
Socrates believed that evil arises from ignorance. He thought that people do wrong because they lack knowledge of what is good and virtuous, so to act in a harmful way is to act against one's own best interest. Socrates believed that knowledge of the good would lead to moral behavior.
Good and evil cannot be attributed to organisations. Only people can be good or evil.
John Locke believed that people were born as a blank slate, or tabula rasa, and that their character was shaped by their experiences and environment. He did not believe that people were inherently good or evil, but rather that they had the capacity to act in ways that aligned with reason and natural law.
Nobody is purely good or purely evil. Everyone has both qualities mixed within them, so that good people sometimes do bad things, and evil people sometimes have good moments.
He uses it for good. His first act while wearing it was not killing Gollum.
Because good people have limits to what they can do(as in to not hurt others) while evil people have no restraints on what they can and cannot do, allowing them much more freedom to get what they want, and thus hurt others (as in good people).
The concept of good and evil can be subjective, as different people and cultures may have varying beliefs about what is considered good or evil based on their values, beliefs, and experiences.
It is the ultimate act of evil to target innocent people for the reason that they are innocent.
Evil, bad, and good are all subjective characterizations. A more accurate way of describing people are in terms of: - empathetic/non-empathetic or compassionate/uncompassionate - ethical/unethical - altruistic/selfish When someone commits a hurtful act against another person, they are acting without empathy or compassion. They are acting for their own emotional satisfaction (be it for impulsivity, compulsion, rage, etc.) and are acting against another person. This often characterizes someone who is "evil", insomuch as they are lacking empathy, acting unethically, and are being selfish in their actions. To classify ALL people as "good" or "evil" is a gross stereotype. Most people have the capacity for acting in ways that are both good or evil. It often depends upon their psychological profile as to whether they inhibit selfish acts or are prone to acting impulsively. There are some people on the spectrum that are more likely to act altruistically (self-sacrificing) and others who are more likely to act selfishly. Human beings are all capable of either.