answersLogoWhite

0

Yes, Mandamus according to the U.S. Supreme Court (Will v. U.S.) is used by the Higher Courts to order the Lower Courts to perform proper judicial functions, one of which is compliance with the Rules of the Court.

User Avatar

Wiki User

17y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

When is a Writ of Mandamus applied?

Writ of Mandamus can be filed, as per our constitution under Article 32 in the Supreme Court, and under Article 226 in the High Courts of the States. All the writs known as the constitutional remedies can be filed under Article 32 and Article 226 of the constitution, if there is any violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Part-III of the constitution. Writ of Mandamus is one remedial right. Writ of Mandamus literally means "We Command" According to the Writ of Mandamus can filed for the performance of the legal duty for which the person has a legal right. It is used for public purposes and to compel performance of public duties. Mandamus lies not only against executive authorities, but also against judicial and quasi-judicial authorities.


How do you use mandamus in a sentence?

The Court upheld the denial of the writ of mandamus made by the prison officials to allow the prisoners access to records of prison officials and other prisoners.


Can the Supreme Court issue a writ of mandamus in certain legal cases?

Yes, the Supreme Court can issue a writ of mandamus in certain legal cases to compel a lower court or government official to perform a specific duty.


What is a court order that can be used to compel a public official to carry out a law?

An order to compel a public official to either perform or not perform is a Writ of Mandamus. When bringing the action against a federal official, it law can be found in 28 U.S.C. section 1361. However, if the action is to be brought against a state official, you must check the state's law and bring the action in the court with the proper jurisdiction. Additionally, a Writ of Mandamus cannot be used to compel an official to do something he or she is not stautorily required to do. - Graduating Law School Student - New York


Should the Court issue a Writ of Mandamus requiring delivery of the commission?

The Court should issue a Writ of Mandamus if the petitioner demonstrates that they have a clear right to the commission, a duty exists for the respondent to deliver it, and there are no other adequate legal remedies available. Mandamus is typically used to compel public officials to perform their duties when they fail to do so. If these conditions are met, the issuance of the writ would be appropriate to ensure the enforcement of the law and the rights of the petitioner.


If the Supreme Court of the US had issued the writ of mandamus how could it have forced Madison to comply with the order What would have happened if he had ignored it (In other words does the Court ha?

If the Supreme Court had issued a writ of mandamus to compel Secretary of State James Madison to deliver the commission for William Marbury, it would have been a direct order requiring Madison to act. However, the Court lacked enforcement power; compliance would depend on the executive branch, which was led by President Thomas Jefferson, who opposed Marbury's appointment. If Madison had ignored the order, the Court would have had no practical means to enforce it, leading to a constitutional crisis and a potential conflict between the judicial and executive branches. This situation highlighted the limitations of judicial power and the reliance on the executive to enforce court decisions.


What act did Marbury Vs Madison decalre unconstutional?

The Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803) declared a provision of the Judiciary Act of 1789 unconstitutional. This provision allowed the Supreme Court to issue writs of mandamus, which would have enabled the Court to compel government officials to act, thus exceeding the authority granted to the Court by the Constitution. This landmark decision established the principle of judicial review, allowing the Court to invalidate laws that conflict with the Constitution.


How do you go over a judge's head with the law other than an appeal?

To go over a judge's head without filing an appeal, a party can seek a writ of mandamus or other extraordinary relief from a higher court, which can compel the lower court to perform a specific act or correct an error. Additionally, parties may file a motion for reconsideration or a motion to vacate the judge's order, depending on the circumstances. Engaging with a higher authority, such as a judicial oversight body, may also be an option if there are concerns about judicial misconduct or bias. However, these alternatives often require solid legal grounds and should be approached with caution.


What is the noun form of compel?

The noun form of compel is compulsion.


Why was Marbury suing Madison and for what?

William Marbury was suing James Madison because Madison, as Secretary of State, failed to deliver Marbury's commission as a justice of the peace, which had been signed by President John Adams. Marbury sought a writ of mandamus from the Supreme Court to compel Madison to deliver the commission. This case, Marbury v. Madison, ultimately led to a landmark ruling that established the principle of judicial review, allowing the Supreme Court to invalidate laws that contradicted the Constitution.


Who is Madison in the marbury vs madiosn case?

In the landmark case Marbury v. Madison (1803), William Marbury is the individual seeking a writ of mandamus to compel Secretary of State James Madison to deliver his commission as a justice of the peace. Marbury had been appointed by outgoing President John Adams, but his commission was not finalized before Adams left office. The case ultimately established the principle of judicial review, allowing the Supreme Court to declare an act of Congress unconstitutional.


What is noun form of compel?

compel