Yes, it is justifiable under certain conditions for public officials to mislead the public. It doesn't take an overactive imagination to think of circumstances where withholding information or purposely disseminating false information would be in the interest of national security and the public's safety. No, it is NEVER justifiable for advertisers to mislead the public about their products. Is it done? Sure. Not all advertiser claims and exaggerations are ethical lapses, however, such as when the makers of unsweetened wheat germ tell us their product tastes yummy. We all know they are full of crap, and little if any harm is done. But when cigarette manufacturers publish bogus study results or withhold information that may have saved lives, well, that's another kettle of rotting fish. Other contributors have said: *Speaking from an ethical standpoint, No!
Too many people think that Advertising and Politics are equally loose with the truth
G. I. Marchenko has written: 'Imidzh v politike' -- subject(s): Advertising, Political, Communication in politics, Political Advertising, Political campaigns, Public relations and politics, Self-presentation
Inoculation advertising is a preemptive advertising in politics. One party attempts to foresee and neutralize potentially damaging criticism from another party by being the first to confront troubling issues.
The essential goal of advertising is to have the advertising message seen or heard with enough enthusiasm to influence an action such as a product purchase or sway in public opinion (politics, social, institutional, etc.). "Public awareness"
By looking at the politics of it. Wars are obtaining political goals by other than political means.
Propaganda is a form of persuasion. That will often mislead one into believing something or doing something. Often in politics and advertising.
In Central America, economics can sometimes shift politics into becoming less moral and more business-oriented
No, not exactly, although you would be understood. In conversational English, we disagree "with" something or someone. Or we have a disagreement "about" something. So, "I love my best friend, but I sometimes disagree with her about politics." Or, "Sometimes my best friend and I have a disagreement about politics."
A persuasive statement is meant to convince the reader of a specific topic. Persuasive statements are used quite liberally in politics, business, and advertising.
it is because the people in politics need votes for wining so if they advertise and tell what all they will do people will vote them and make them leader
Ann Treneman has written: 'Dave & Nick' -- subject(s): Politics and government, Humor, Coalition governments, History 'The making of a feminist ad...and why it needs making' -- subject(s): Advertising, Feminism, Women in advertising
That is a fact. Not everyone, but some (or a lot) of people. That's what scams, advertising, and politics are all relying on.
I believe sometimes yes they can, if it is uncomfortable or unsettling to customers or it is disrupting to coworkers.
Nicoletta Vasta has written: 'Rallying voters' -- subject(s): Advertising, Political, Communication in politics, Discourse analysis, Labour Party (Great Britain), Language, Political Advertising, Political aspects, Political aspects of Discourse analysis, Political oratory
Geoffrey Stevens has written: 'The Player' -- subject(s): Advertising, Biography, Journalists, Politicians, Politics and government, Progressive Conservative Party of Canada
She was known for guiding her husband as the president in politics. They even called her mrs president sometimes
In politics one sometimes talks of arbitrary government. Another word that occurs to me is corruption.
A lot of his plays which are about Kings and Queens are about politics, and Kings and Queens were at the centre of politics in his time. Sometimes they are like fairy stories which as you know are often about Kings and Queens. Cymbeline is a little like this.
Woodrow Wilson was sometimes gven this name. He spent most of his life as a professor and college president.
Human characteristics = culture, religion, politics and something else- i forgot what i hate this site sometimes
NEGATIVE: - Introduced the occult into national politics. - Justified extermination on races based on occult doctrine incorporated into national politics. - Justified slavery on basis of race - Purges of all intellegensia from "less desirable" races. And eventually people in bulk. - Justified human experimentation on behalf of race. POSITIVE: - Cured recession of Wehimar Republic (unemployment & inflation). - Booted out illegal occupiers of Germany especially Koblenz. - Created a functioning public works system after Wehimar Republic which became from zero to almost world class (national highways authority of Germany- ala Autobahn). - Volkswagen. - Poured immense money into scientific R&D and worked closely w/ public sector.
•Language •Culture •Politics •Economy •Governmental interference •Labor •Labor relations •Financing •Market research •Advertising •Money •Transportation/ communication •Control •Contracts
We can say that, politics then is different from the politics now, because, politics then was less democratic than politics now.
Anna McCarthy has written: 'Ambient television' -- subject(s): Social aspects, Social aspects of Television broadcasting, Television broadcasting 'The citizen machine' -- subject(s): Television advertising, Political culture, Television viewers, Advocacy advertising, Philosophy, Television broadcasting, Attitudes, Television and politics
Jan van Lieshout has written: 'The art of color' 'Het kan wel op al is het lekker!' -- subject(s): Advertising, History, Social aspects of Advertising, Social conditions 'Alle stemmen gelden' -- subject(s): Politics and government, Representative government and representation