No. Missiles gotta be able to detect planes in the radar in order get a lock on because missiles need to get a lock on to shoot down planes but planes fly in really high altitudes, this makes it even more difficult to detect planes on radar.
They went from having only machine guns to much more advanced cannons and guided missiles.
President Kennedy sent US warships to blockade Cuba and prevent Soviet ships from delivering more nuclear materials to Cuba. This led to the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Yes but not really easy.
All current missiles are electrically triggered in a sequence to 'spool up' as they release from the aircraft.
A missile Hitler issued was the V-1 and V-2 missiles which was there strongest missiles but failed because they were hard to control, did not have good accuracy and had not much fuel.
In 1962, the world learned that there was a build up of medium range missiles and missile bases in Cuba. U2 spy planes actually photographed the missiles and the bases.
If you are asking about the missiles in Cuba they were discovered by the use of spy planes and people on the ground. A spy plane flew over and shot pictures of the silos for the missiles. The people on the ground confirmed that they were there. Kennedy told Russia that they had to remove the missiles and the result was the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Having planes is an outstanding idea
The second generation of fighter planes were jet fighters with no missiles or complicated avionics.
Actually yes but the problem is that planes can't get shot down so easily.
They used missiles, bombs, fuel-laden planes, and biological weapons.
Detecting and ranging (measuring the distance of) enemy craft in air (planes) and water (ships and subs).