I think you may be confusing the meaning of the term.
The word obiter dicta is a Latin word which means "things said by the way." Obiter dicta can be passing comments, opinions or examples provided by a judge. Statements constituting 'obiter dicta' are not binding. [For example, if a court dismisses a case due to lack of jurisdiction and offers opinions on the merits of a case, then these opinions constitute 'obiter dicta.'] Obiter dictum (plural of obiter dicta) is an opinion or a remark made by a judge which does not form a part of the court's decision.
Therefore, obiter dictum are not legally binding and can ONLY be rescinded, or withdrawn, by the judge who made them.
Obiter dicta is a remark made by a judge which forms no part of the reasoning that is directly responsible for the verdict (called the 'rationes decidendi" also called simply "the ratio"). When reading a judgment if a statement is essential to the reasoning of the decision it is part of the rationes decidendi. If it is a side comment, superfluous or not connected to the main body of reasoning its called obiter dicta or simply dicta.
Ratio decidendi refers to the legal reasoning behind a court's decision that forms the binding precedent in future cases. Obiter dicta are statements or opinions made by the court that are not essential to the decision and do not create binding precedent, but may provide guidance or insight on the case.
Obiter dictum refers to remarks made by a judge in a legal opinion that are not essential to the decision of the case. These comments are considered persuasive but not binding precedent.
Words said in passing in a court case in the UK refer to comments made by the judge or legal professionals (such as barristers or solicitors) that are not central to the main legal arguments being presented. These remarks are not binding as legal precedent but may provide insight into the judge's thinking or help clarify certain points.
"Obiter dictum" or simply "dictum" or "dicta" is the term used to describe statements made by a court in its opinion that are unnecessary to decide the case. When such an unnecessary statement is used to negate a party's attorney's position, that attorney will refer to it as "merely obiter dictum (or "mere dicta") which does not bind this court." When used in support of the case, it is called "supporting rationale for the court's ultimate decision deserving of great weight for its wisdom."
holding is the rule of law or legal principle that comes from the decision or the judgment plus the material facts of the case dicta means other statements in the decision that do not form part of the holding
I rescinded my check I made out to the school.
The judge judged the foods that the chef made.
The cast of Made in the USA - 2005 includes: Nolan Bushnell as Judge Joy Mangano as Judge Karim Rashid as Judge
Yes, it is possible to appeal a judge's ruling in a higher court, but suing a judge for a ruling they made is generally not allowed due to judicial immunity.
Yes, a judge can overrule another judge in a court case if they believe the previous judge made an error in their decision or ruling.
If a judge has not made a decision, the plaintiff and their attorney can drop, or settle, the tort. However, once a judge has made a decision, the judge's decision is upheld by law, and the plaintiff has no say.