Yes, but that can't be used as an excuse. You could even be made an accessory to a crime without knowing it. Let's say you and a friend stop at a convenient store for a soda. You stay in the car, but your friend is in the place robbing it. He gets in the car and you leave, but you have just driven the get away car. This makes you an accessory to the robbery. This is one reason why you need to be sure who you are with.
Yes, one is capable of 'accidentally' committing a crime.
Crimes that do not include intent are referred to as "Strict Liability Crimes", although these are not the only crimes where your question may apply.
An example may be a statutory sex offense (which is determined based on age). If a 23 year old has sexual relations with a 17 year old (let's assume the age of consent is 18 in this case), the 23 year old has committed a crime. Whether the 23 year old actually knew, or had the intent, of committing a crime is irrelevant.
no, so....
Special deterrence means that, if a person commit a crime,punishmentwill be apply on to that individual so that person don't commit a crime again.
i think they would do a crime out of jealousy so that they can be noticed.
They can claim to be you, so when they commit crime, they don't get blamed, You do.
He is upset about Johnny dying so he robs a supermarket.
Drug addicts junkies are more likely to commit a crime as they need to feed their habit every single day a few times a day for some of them so where else are they going to get the funds to pay for their habit if not commit crime every day also
Your going to be dead after you commit suicide, so whys it matter?
Facial expression is almost an involuntary act.)
No. There was crime before there were guns. I collect guns. My children and grandchildren are hunters and target shooters. I do not commit crimes, nor does my family. People that want to commit crimes will do so, with or without a gun.
Kings were exonerated from crimes if one or more were committed so if he did commit one, no one would bring it forward to court. Hammurabi was known to be a just King.
No.
He didn't commit a crime. He wouldn't keep quiet about the rape of a young girl, so the noble falsely imprisoned him.