answersLogoWhite

0

It depends on the type of stipend it was, but generally, while it would be possible to make the claim, you would likely fail to meet the burden of proof required to be successful in your legal action without evidence. Please consult a local lawyer who can deal with the specifics in your case.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is the definition of 'allegation'?

An allegation (also called adduction) is a legal term where the claim of a fact is made by a party who claim to have proof. Until proof is provided in a court of law the claim will remain an allegation.


What are the requirement to proof a claim sharia?

can you proof my my claim is not true


How can one claim a warranty on Canon cookers without a proof of purchase?

You will need some kind of proof of purchase in order to claim warranty on a Canon cooker. The proof of purchase may be a store receipt or a credit card bill.


What does allege mean?

declared, but without proof to judge some one without having proof


What is a proof of claim filed in an estate?

A proof of claim is filed by a creditor of the decedent. That claim must be paid before any assets are distributed to the heirs. A Proof of Claim is a form that a creditor submits to the court to get paid.


What does root word claim mean?

state or assert that something is the case, typically without providing evidence or proof


What is the importance of ethical proof in determining the validity of a claim or argument?

Ethical proof is important in determining the validity of a claim or argument because it ensures that the information presented is reliable, honest, and based on moral principles. Without ethical proof, there is a risk of misinformation, manipulation, and deception, which can undermine the credibility and trustworthiness of the claim or argument. Ethical proof helps to uphold integrity, transparency, and fairness in discussions and debates, ultimately leading to more informed and ethical decision-making.


How does misplacing the burden of proof fallacy impact the validity of an argument?

Misplacing the burden of proof fallacy occurs when someone makes a claim but expects others to disprove it, rather than providing evidence to support their claim. This impacts the validity of an argument because the burden of proof should always be on the person making the claim. Without proper evidence, the argument lacks credibility and cannot be considered valid.


This rhetorical device works by suggesting that there is evidence or authority for a claim without actually citing this evidence?

Proof surrogate is a flawed rhetorical device that suggests evidence to support their argument, but does not provide the source. An example of a proof surrogate would be saying "studies show that you can get cancer from microwaves" without providing the studies.


What is an example using proof surrogate as a rhetorical device that would affect you?

An expression used to suggest that there is evidence or authority for a claim without actually saying that there is.


Can you be charge with thef without proof?

No, you cannot be charged with theft without proof. In order to bring charges, law enforcement and prosecutors must have sufficient evidence to support the claim that a theft occurred and that the accused was involved. This evidence can include eyewitness accounts, surveillance footage, or physical evidence linking the suspect to the crime. Without such proof, a charge would likely not stand in court.


What is misplacing the burden of proof fallacy?

Misplacing the burden of proof fallacy occurs when someone makes a claim and then expects others to disprove it, rather than providing evidence to support their claim. In debates or discussions, the burden of proof rests on the person making the claim, not on others to disprove it.