No, a person cannot live without their lungs.
No. The lungs are required not only for breathing, but also for dissolution of oxygen into the bloodstream for subsequent transport to all the cells of the body.
Yes but only for how long you can hold your breath after you take your last.
No, because if you dont have lungs you wont be able to breath so you cant live.
NO
Because lungs are what make you breathe, and without breathing we would die.
no, they wouldn't be able to breathe.
You can't breath! You wouldn't last a minute without them
Once they actually fail, the person will die immediately. You cannot live without working lungs.
Brain, heart, liver, pancreas, both lungs
You couldn't live without your lungs for even a second.
You can't - lungs are vital organs in humans that a person cannot survive without. We can supplement oxygen to lungs and help extremely damaged lungs function well enough to maintain life (sometimes), but you still have to have lungs to breathe and live.
You can't live without your lungs because you cannot breath without them. Without them they cannot introduce inhaled oxygen to the Circulatory system.
you can live without your bladder lungs small intestine
Um NO! Because if you can't breathe then it's impossible to live so no you can't live without lungs. -- Well actually, it depends. Cardio/Pulmonary devices, lung transplant, etc. offer hope to those with respiratory failure.
OMG obviously you do die without lungs. u need them to breathe and u kinda can't live without breathing!