Want this question answered?
The two main goals of science are: -Hypothesize and Experiment: make an educated guess and conduct an activity to prove your hypothesis -Answer and Conclude: Discuss the results and share with others
Scientific method uses rules, but is more than just a set of rules. The word Science comes from the Latin and means to know.It is the careful study of a subject, and the formulation of an hypothesis to explain the observations. The explanation should be open to criticism, and the results of any experiment should be repeatable by others. It should be open to an extrapolation of the results, and thus have some predictive value.
Formally for a theory answer, no. In practice, yes. A very important part of the process of science requires that other researchers test new theories of others, which requires that it be communicated.
comparing means the word itself "compare" compare means you put two or more objects and you see the differences and observe them.
There are many wonders of science. The subjects of biology, anatomy, astronomy, Earth sciences, and others are considered wonders of science.
Science is a systematic study of the natural world based on evidence, experimentation, and observation to understand how things work. Pseudoscience, on the other hand, refers to beliefs or practices that claim to be scientific but lack empirical evidence, are not testable or falsifiable, and do not adhere to the scientific method.
It is a way for others to visualize your results.
Nazi propaganda often used pseudoscience to make claims about the superiority of the Aryan race over others. Eugenics based on this pseudoscience was one of the atrocities that occurred in concentration camps.
2- Accurate experiments, 2- Keenobservations 3- conclusions, 4- Results confirmed by others.
ask the question backround research construct hypothesis test with an experiment analize results report results
the scientific process is when you conduct and experiment re check your results over and over again then have those results posted in a scientific journal for others to check before having it pretty much verified as scientific fact unless someone finds faults in you experiments or results.
The two main goals of science are: -Hypothesize and Experiment: make an educated guess and conduct an activity to prove your hypothesis -Answer and Conclude: Discuss the results and share with others
In a science experiment you should follow established scientific protocols, ensure than your work is properly documented and publish the results so that others can repeat the experiment and verify the result.
It's like checking your work. With peers to review what scientists claim, we get a lot less crackpottery. In other words, getting others to make sure your results are valid benefits the science community by keeping unsubstantiated pseudoscience from becoming accepted fact. For example, there are those that conclude the earth is flat (yes, still). However, with a little peer review, they are quickly shown to be either nutters or attention seeking goofs, as the earth can be shown in many, many ways to be a sphere.
Encouraging openmindedness, and the ability to draw conclusions from the bare facts rather than always relying on others.
Scientific method uses rules, but is more than just a set of rules. The word Science comes from the Latin and means to know.It is the careful study of a subject, and the formulation of an hypothesis to explain the observations. The explanation should be open to criticism, and the results of any experiment should be repeatable by others. It should be open to an extrapolation of the results, and thus have some predictive value.
Formally for a theory answer, no. In practice, yes. A very important part of the process of science requires that other researchers test new theories of others, which requires that it be communicated.