no
I know for one thing, that science can't prove anything. That is essentially one major thing that makes up science today, and has for centuries. But really, If science can't prove anything, Did science just prove that science can't prove anything? Because if it did, then you can prove that science is wrong, because you just proved something!
You create a theory. Prove the theory to be true by testing it. If it works, it is true. If it does not work, it is not true.
Science cannot really PROVE anything. If you consider the arguments of, for example, the 18th century philosopher David Hume, then you will see that science cannot prove things as it consistently relies on induction to form conclusions and induction does not say that something is definitely the result of something else, only that it could be or is likely or even appears at this moment to be the only explanation. Therefore, if we put this belief into the original question "Can science prove something that does not exist?", both yes and no can be argued. No because science cannot prove anything, therefore, it cannot prove something that does exist and it cannot prove something that does not exist. Yes because if you do still believe that science can prove that existing things do exist, you will believe that it can prove that non-exisiting also exist because obviously if a mistake is made to come to this false conclusion, you (the person who has found such a result) will not know the mistake has occured and will not question it if you have done everything right according to the procedures for proving things, because you believe that if you have followed such procedures then you must have proven it because that is the way you believe science works. A complicated discussion really, depends what you believe about the reliabity of 'fact' and the nature of 'proof'. it's true the science is can really prove any thing.=]
an educated guess or something you want to prove, the main goal of your experiment.
He wants to prove he can make new life? or something like that.
Some science suggests that a god may exist. However there is still no proof to prove that god does exist. Actually, there's no proof to prove that science exists either, but don't let that bother you. Just take our word for it. Would we get something this important wrong?
It didn't, science cannot prove how something can possibly exist forever. Everything must have a begging and an end.
it is a question that science cannot prove such as, "are vampires real", because science cannot prove that supernatural things exist
it is a question that science cannot prove such as, "are vampires real", because science cannot prove that supernatural things exist
It means scientists don't believe something unless there's significant evidence, theoretical or experimental, that strongly suggest or prove it
it does and it doesnt exist can prove and cant not prove so there you have it
An experiment can prove they are wrong or right ...:)