answersLogoWhite

0

Can science prove something

User Avatar

Anonymous

8y ago
Updated: 8/21/2019

no

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How do you prove science wrong?

I know for one thing, that science can't prove anything. That is essentially one major thing that makes up science today, and has for centuries. But really, If science can't prove anything, Did science just prove that science can't prove anything? Because if it did, then you can prove that science is wrong, because you just proved something!


How does science prove something is true?

You create a theory. Prove the theory to be true by testing it. If it works, it is true. If it does not work, it is not true.


Can science prove something that does not exist?

Science cannot really PROVE anything. If you consider the arguments of, for example, the 18th century philosopher David Hume, then you will see that science cannot prove things as it consistently relies on induction to form conclusions and induction does not say that something is definitely the result of something else, only that it could be or is likely or even appears at this moment to be the only explanation. Therefore, if we put this belief into the original question "Can science prove something that does not exist?", both yes and no can be argued. No because science cannot prove anything, therefore, it cannot prove something that does exist and it cannot prove something that does not exist. Yes because if you do still believe that science can prove that existing things do exist, you will believe that it can prove that non-exisiting also exist because obviously if a mistake is made to come to this false conclusion, you (the person who has found such a result) will not know the mistake has occured and will not question it if you have done everything right according to the procedures for proving things, because you believe that if you have followed such procedures then you must have proven it because that is the way you believe science works. A complicated discussion really, depends what you believe about the reliabity of 'fact' and the nature of 'proof'. it's true the science is can really prove any thing.=]


What is a hyposethesis on a science project?

an educated guess or something you want to prove, the main goal of your experiment.


What is Frankenstein's purpose in pursuing science?

He wants to prove he can make new life? or something like that.


Science of god?

Science exists, so also God. I am a living evidence for the existence of God. If you know me, you will understand. I am surrounded by lot of negative forces (spirits). I am scolding them daily. I think most of the people or almost all people are hearing my voices as well as evil spirits’ voices everyday. At present all creatures including human beings are living in a miraculous era of God. This is a temporary miracle of God. I am connected to all creatures including human beings and spirits internally by God since year 1950 but I am not a God. I think that all human beings can see what I see, can hear what I hear and even know my thoughts. But thoughts are complicated matter. It needs an explanation. The people who have born in this era cannot realize this miracle because they have born with it. An old brave and honest gentleman aged 85 can explain about this miracle.


How did energy always exist?

It didn't, science cannot prove how something can possibly exist forever. Everything must have a begging and an end.


What is a nontestable question?

it is a question that science cannot prove such as, "are vampires real", because science cannot prove that supernatural things exist


What is a skepitcal attitude in science?

It means scientists don't believe something unless there's significant evidence, theoretical or experimental, that strongly suggest or prove it


What is a non testable question?

it is a question that science cannot prove such as, "are vampires real", because science cannot prove that supernatural things exist


What does science say about Heaven and Hell?

it does and it doesnt exist can prove and cant not prove so there you have it


Does science prove theories are wrong by using experiments?

An experiment can prove they are wrong or right ...:)