0
What else can I help you with?
In which part of the scientific method would you record your observations?
You would obviously record your observations in the first part of the scientific method i.e titled commonly as "Observation". Because only after recording your observation you can move onto the second part of scientific method i.e "Questioning".
What scientific nomenclature separates humans from the animals?
Strictly speaking, only human beings use scientific nomenclature, so I would have to say that all of it separates humans from other animals.
Which part of the scientific process includes identifying problems?
It can only be identified in the research lab during the research.
what are characteristics of observation?
Science is based upon verifiable evidence. By 'evidence' we mean factual observations other observers can see,weigh, count and check for accuracy. Scientific observation is not the same as just 'looking at things'. The characteristics of scientific observations are as follows: 1. It is accurate. 2. It is presice. 3.It is systematic. 4.It is recorded. 5.It is objective. 6.They are made by trained observers. 7.They are made under controlled conditions. 8.It is according to time. This is only a short description of scientific observation. To know more use other websites.
True or false Only humans can carry out scientific experiments on mars?
False. While humans are currently the only beings capable of physically carrying out scientific experiments on Mars, robotic probes and rovers have also conducted various experiments and research on Mars.
Is it true that gravity is only a theory, or is it an established scientific fact?
Gravity is an established scientific fact, not just a theory. It is a fundamental force that governs the interactions of objects in the universe, as confirmed by numerous experiments and observations.
Are fog and smog types of clouds made by humans?
Only smog is caused by humans.
What are the characteristics of observation?
Science is based upon verifiable evidence. By 'evidence' we mean factual observations other observers can see,weigh, count and check for accuracy. Scientific observation is not the same as just 'looking at things'. The characteristics of scientific observations are as follows: 1. It is accurate. 2. It is presice. 3.It is systematic. 4.It is recorded. 5.It is objective. 6.They are made by trained observers. 7.They are made under controlled conditions. 8.It is according to time. This is only a short description of scientific observation. To know more use other websites.
Have humans or human-made objects traveled to mars or on it?
Man-made objects have traveled to Mars, zoomed by Mars and kept going, crashed on Mars, entered orbit around Mars, and landed on Mars. At least three of them are presently creeping around on the surface of Mars under the command and control of their own on-board software and controllers on Earth, performing scientific experiments and observations, and communicating their findings back to Earth. The only astronomical body other than Earth around which humans have entered orbit or upon which humans have walked is the moon ... roughly 1/2 of 1 percent of the distance from here to Mars.
How are Aristotle's teaching related to the scientific method used by scientists today?
He urged people to use their sences to make observations, just as scientist today make observations
How is scientific observation different from a persons opinion?
A scientific observation is simply what someone has seen but does not (by itself) say anything more. Scientific observations are used to formulate theories and these theories you might call "provisional facts". So, a theory is like a fact that can be overturned by a new observation and causes a newer and better theory to be formulated. After lots of observation the "provisional facts" become clearer and clearer and we get closer to "truth". A scientist's opinion (on a scientific subject) is based on the current theory which in turn is supported by all the observations that have ever been made. A person's opinion is not an observation. It is a conclusion based on what that person believes. Some opinions can not be proven to be wrong (or right). Different people can have different opinions based on the same observations. So, an opinion can only be shown to be wrong if there is evidence to show it is wrong - and a scientific observation is an example of how this can be done. To understand this some more, compare the scientific theory of evolution with creationist views about evolution. Both use the same observations and they disagree. Scientists use all existing observations to formulate theories and the latest and best theory is used to form their opinions because it is the one that accounts for all existing observations successfully. However, creationists start with an opinion about how evolution happened based on the Bible, then selectively ignore observations that conflict with their opinion.
Science investigates only the?
controlled experiment and observations..i might be wrong
