They wouldn't dare, but could they? Yes.
Nuclear. Napalm is simply gelled gasoline fire bomb.
A fire bomb is a conventional incendiary bomb: magnesium, napalm, etc. A nuclear bomb uses fission and/or fusion and is mostly a blast effect weapon.
Japan was almost destroyed when the nuclear bomb were deployed. Tokyo and Kyoto were bomb with fire bombs which had more casualties than the nuclear bombs but compare the two, the nuclear bomb were more potent.
Smoke bomb Tear bomb Hydrogen bomb Nuclear bomb Water bomb Atomic bomb Fire bomb Grenade Dynamite Poison gas bomb Acid bomb Flare bomb Spark bomb Fireworks Stink bomb
We have fired thousands of them, the end hasn't come!
The Bradley vehicle is not a nuclear capable weapon system.
The bomb that can bomb without needing city lights was called the V2 Rocket bomb. All the Nazi Germans had to do was aim, fire and off it went to the place they wanted to bomb. It was not precision bombing but it was good enough to do a lot of damage to the UK.
The atomic bomb killed millions of people in just one bomb , the napalm on the other hand , was nothing like it . Napalm is a chemical device ... it produces fire (it's also called jellied gasoline). An atomic bomb is a nuclear device ... and puts out considerably more energy.
Possible natural gas fire or explosion.
no!!!!!the Hindenburg did not explode. its aluminum painted skin caught fire from an electrostatic discharge. that fire ignited ordinary chemical hydrogen/oxygen fires as the lift gas bladders breached.no nuclear fusion was involved. not even a chemical explosion occurred.
No, fire is chemical energy not nuclear
In 16 July 1945. (The nuclear test was called Trinity)