No. Congress has the authority to declare war; the President has certain war powers that have a similar effect, but he is not supposed to declare war unilaterally.
The Constitution doesn't grant the US Supreme Court any power with respect to engaging in wars or military actions.
you guys are to dumb to figure it out
Yes, Congress, alone, can declare war. A president can initiate military action which must be approved by Congress within 30 days, or cease hostilities.
Some undeclared wars have been approved by Congress without actual declarations of war.
No, the US Supreme Court cannot declare that war is unconstitutional. The Constitution specifically places the power to declare war in the Congress of the United States. With such a specific constitutional provision, it would be impossible to assert that exercising it was contrary to the Constitution.
Now, the Court might declare that a particular Declaration of War was unconstitutional because specific procedures were not followed, or because of other aspects of the particular vote, but even that would be a very difficult read and would result in a major constitutional crisis..
yes it can. thats one of the power of the legislative branch
No. Declaration of war is one of the powers of Congress.
The Supreme Court does not possess the power to declare war. Only Congress has the power to officially declare war on another nation.
Yes it does
yes
They can declare executive acts unconstitutional
"inferior courts"Article IIISection 1. The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.
Supreme Court Justices, Associate Justices of the Supreme Court -- although, the head of the courts are called:The US Supreme Court - Chief Justice of the United States (since 1866 when it was changed from Chief Justice of the Supreme Court).The various state Supreme Courts - Chief Justice of the State of (state name).But, not all states call their highest court the "Supreme Court." Some use "Court of Appeals," "Superior Court," "Supreme Judicial Court," and Texas and Oklahoma divide criminal and civil supreme courts by calling them (respectively) The Court of Criminal Appeals and The Supreme Court. Nomenclature will follow the trends in the individual states.
Some states call their trial courts supreme courts. In most states, the supreme court, like the federal Supreme Court, is the highest appellate court in the state. A bankruptcy may not stop a case on appeal to a state supreme court. But if it is a trial court, then bankruptcy can stop a case from going forward. Consult a local bankruptcy lawyer.
A judicial review
Most people believe that there is one supreme power that created the creation. Christains call him God, Muslims call him Allah, Hindus call him Bhagwan and so on. Ethiests however believe that no such supreme creator exists.
No, you do not automatically get a writ of certiorari when called to the Supreme Court. A writ of certiorari is a discretionary order issued by the Supreme Court to review a lower court's decision. The Court grants this writ if it believes the case raises significant legal issues or conflicts among different courts.
AnswerThe United States has one Supreme Court in the federal judicial system. There are Regional and District Federal Courts through which cases of a federal nature are appealed and heard. Each of the 50 states has a court, usually referred to as the (State) Supreme Court, that has the responsibility of interpreting the constitution of that state. These courts are not part of the federal judicial system.See Related Questions for more information about the federal judicial system.
In the US, the Constitution and the Constitution of the United States is the same thing; they aren't two different documents, so there is no "both."Yes, Article III of the Constitution (aka US Constitution, Constitution of the United States) required Congress to establish one Supreme Court, and also permitted them to create whatever "inferior courts" (meaning lower than the Supreme Court) they needed to handle the federal government's legal business.Article III, Section I"The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office."
A call to the bar is an admission to practice in law courts.
first declare and then call
AnswerYes . . . . . and no.THE Supreme Court of the United States is in Washington, DC, but in New York city, there are courts that deal in murder. These are called supreme courts. Odd to call them that, isn't it, 'cause they are more or less just plain old courts.AnswerNo. The State of New York refers to its trial courts as the "supreme court," a holdover from early in the state's history. The highest court in the state is the New York Court of Appeals, located in Albany.The US Supreme Court met for the first time at the Royal Exchange Building in New York City, on February 2, 1790, but moved to Philadelphia in 1791, then to Washington, DC, in 1800.For more information, see Related Questions, below.