0
What else can I help you with?
What is the theory of creation of matter and antimatter from nothing?
You are giving the definition for the Big Bang Theory.
What does the big bang theory and antimatter have in common?
Scientists "speculate" that the Big Bang created antimatter, but it was destroyed when coming into contact with stars, planets, and other matter.
Which is the main concept of the Big Bang. is it the matter and anti-matter collision or the wide unstabilized spreading of mass and energy?
The spread of mass and space. The matter-antimatter collisions HAD to happen after the big bang.
What are two questions physicists have regarding antimatter?
1. Why is there more matter than antimatter in the Universe? Or: Why is there matter at all? (If there were the same amount of matter and antimatter, and it came into contact, it would quickly get destroyed. 2. If antimatter is so abundant, how come we've never come in contact with it or have been able to observe it?
How could it B true that matter and antimatter at start of big bang With little amount of matter left in end winning B enough 2 make up all we see today?
It is not currently known why there is more matter than antimatter. Some assymetries (differences between matter and antimatter) have been found, but they are very slight, and it is not clear how this could have been enough to create the matter we see today.
What is the goal CERN?
By recreating Big Bang conditions, scientists at CERN trie to answer following questions:Why is there no-more antimatter left, although both, matter and antimatter were resulting from the Big Bang in equal parts and thus, should've annihilate themselves?Why do particles have mass? What is mass? Is the origin of mass the Higgs-boson?Does dark matter exist? What is dark matter?Do extra dimensions exist?
What is cern trying to do with the large hadron collider?
By recreating Big Bang conditions, scientists at CERN trie to answer following questions:Why is there no-more antimatter left, although both, matter and antimatter were resulting from the Big Bang in equal parts and thus, should've annihilate themselves?Why do particles have mass? What is mass? Is the origin of mass the Higgs-boson?Does dark matter exist? What is dark matter?Do extra dimensions exist?
Was the explosion out of antimatter?
Current physical theory tends to indicate there should be a symmetry expressed in the form of a parity between matter and antimatter created in the Big Bang, with no preference for matter over antimatter; this explosion should have created equal amounts of both, which would then annihilate each other. However, the universe tends to be dominated so far as we can tell by matter and no significant regions of antimatter have yet been detected. This would indicate an asymmetry or bias in favor of matter's creation, which is somewhat mysterious and remains a subject of research. In any case, this bias of matter over antimatter is believed to be extremely small - such that it may have been for every billion particles of antimatter created, there were a billion and one particles of matter.
Is it possible for the Big Bang Theory to be true using antimatter?
The question itself is a little unclear, but one of the open questions in cosmology is why there appears to be an imbalance in the amounts of matter and antimatter in the universe. This doesn't mean the Big Bang theory is incorrect, it just means that there's a piece that hasn't been explained yet.
Why is still antimatter in the universe if it was defeated by the matter in the big bang?
Our current understanding says that matter-antimatter pairs can be produced by a sufficiently strong energy field, and further says that this is happening all the time. Normally these particles quickly meet up and annihilate each other, but under certain conditions this might not happen, which would leave free antimatter particles running around.
What is the matter antimatter reaction called?
When matter and anti matter is combined, they are both annihilated, so it is called annihilation. This is why physicists are so confused - we don't know why there is matter left in this universe, if matter and anti matter were both created in equal quantities in the big bang.
Was there more particles or antiparticles during the big bang?
There must have been the same amount of matter and antimatter initially. It is still a mystery why matter is predominant today, but some slight assymetry (that is, small differences between matter and antimatter) have already been found. For a more thorough discussion, see here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baryogenesis
