answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Because of taxes, yes....unless you have money to pay the taxes on it (one of them is the inheritance tax)

That's in the United States, not sure about other places

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Can the government just take a property from you if you have been willed the property it and it can not be sold?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Does a Beretta M9 government issue pistol have US Property marked on it or just US M9 9mm on it?

It will be marked "Property of US Government".


When can the government take private property and what what must the government give the owners?

"just compensation" (5th Amendment)


Private property cannot be taken away by the government without?

Private property cannot be taken by the government without what ?


Where did Jesus learn of others blessings?

From God, probably. He might've been born just knowing them (Of course, if this is so , it us ultimately because God willed it).


When can the government take private property and what must they give the owners?

just compensation5th amendment


Should individuals be allowed to own property or should property be owned by the government?

This is completely dependent on your beliefs. If all property is owned by the government, you have no safety from the government controlling your life. If they wish to use your location of residence for something else, then they can force you to move elsewhere. If property is owned privately, the property that could be used in better ways, but the owner is too stubborn to sell it, will just be wasted property. Both have benefits and both have faults.


Can the executor not sell a house that is in a living trust willed to three people other than themselves?

This question has so many mixed and conflicting terms, that it is difficult to even understand the question, much less provide an answer. This answer will assume the probable situation that creates this question. I assume that the "property" that has been "willed" to 3 people is part of a living trust created by the decedent during his lifetime. If the decedent transferred this property to a living trust, the executor has no power at all to sell it. This is because the executor has power over property belonging to the decedent. This property is owned by the living trust, therefore, beyond the authority of the executor. Once the decedent transferred the property to the trust, the trust became the legal owner just as if the decedent had transferred the property to another person. Since the decedent no longer owns the property, he has no more power to "will" that property to anyone than I have to will your property to someone. Unless the trust provides that upon his death the property goes into his own estate the executor is powerless to sell to anyone. But this would be extremely unlikely, because the purpose of the living trust is to keep that property out of the decedent's estate.


Your mother died 10 years ago and you continued to live in the house that she willed to you and your siblings you cotinued to pay NJ property taxes As executrix you never changed the deed Is this frau?

Continuing to pay property taxes on a house willed to you and your siblings without changing the deed may not necessarily be fraudulent, but it can lead to legal complexities. It's essential to ensure the property is properly transferred to the rightful heirs to avoid potential disputes and comply with legal requirements.Consulting with a legal professional can help clarify the necessary steps to address the situation lawfully.


Was Cleopatra important in Italy?

Ordinarily, Cleopatra would not have been important in Italy. To the Romans she was just another ruler, although they had a protectorate over Egypt which had been willed to them on several occasions. However in the power struggle between Octavian and Antony, she became important. Octavian used her as a source for the civil war that brought him to sole power.Ordinarily, Cleopatra would not have been important in Italy. To the Romans she was just another ruler, although they had a protectorate over Egypt which had been willed to them on several occasions. However in the power struggle between Octavian and Antony, she became important. Octavian used her as a source for the civil war that brought him to sole power.Ordinarily, Cleopatra would not have been important in Italy. To the Romans she was just another ruler, although they had a protectorate over Egypt which had been willed to them on several occasions. However in the power struggle between Octavian and Antony, she became important. Octavian used her as a source for the civil war that brought him to sole power.Ordinarily, Cleopatra would not have been important in Italy. To the Romans she was just another ruler, although they had a protectorate over Egypt which had been willed to them on several occasions. However in the power struggle between Octavian and Antony, she became important. Octavian used her as a source for the civil war that brought him to sole power.Ordinarily, Cleopatra would not have been important in Italy. To the Romans she was just another ruler, although they had a protectorate over Egypt which had been willed to them on several occasions. However in the power struggle between Octavian and Antony, she became important. Octavian used her as a source for the civil war that brought him to sole power.Ordinarily, Cleopatra would not have been important in Italy. To the Romans she was just another ruler, although they had a protectorate over Egypt which had been willed to them on several occasions. However in the power struggle between Octavian and Antony, she became important. Octavian used her as a source for the civil war that brought him to sole power.Ordinarily, Cleopatra would not have been important in Italy. To the Romans she was just another ruler, although they had a protectorate over Egypt which had been willed to them on several occasions. However in the power struggle between Octavian and Antony, she became important. Octavian used her as a source for the civil war that brought him to sole power.Ordinarily, Cleopatra would not have been important in Italy. To the Romans she was just another ruler, although they had a protectorate over Egypt which had been willed to them on several occasions. However in the power struggle between Octavian and Antony, she became important. Octavian used her as a source for the civil war that brought him to sole power.Ordinarily, Cleopatra would not have been important in Italy. To the Romans she was just another ruler, although they had a protectorate over Egypt which had been willed to them on several occasions. However in the power struggle between Octavian and Antony, she became important. Octavian used her as a source for the civil war that brought him to sole power.


How are the fourth and fifth amendment similar?

both prohibit the seizure of private property just cause apex


How do you get money in just cause 2?

Money is attained by destroying Government Property such as buildings and creating CHAOS


Was France a dictatorship during world war 2?

No. Just very weak willed