0
What else can I help you with?
Does a Beretta M9 government issue pistol have US Property marked on it or just US M9 9mm on it?
It will be marked "Property of US Government".
When can the government take private property and what what must the government give the owners?
"just compensation" (5th Amendment)
Private property cannot be taken away by the government without?
Private property cannot be taken by the government without what ?
Where did Jesus learn of others blessings?
From God, probably. He might've been born just knowing them (Of course, if this is so , it us ultimately because God willed it).
When can the government take private property and what must they give the owners?
just compensation5th amendment
Under the U.S. Constitution, what limitations are placed on the government's ability to take private property?
Under the U.S. Constitution, the government's ability to take private property is limited by the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause, which requires that the government provide just compensation for any property taken for public use. This means that the government cannot take private property without fair payment to the owner.
What is the Just Compensation Clause?
The Just Compensation Clause is a provision in the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution that requires the government to provide fair compensation to property owners when their property is taken for public use, often referred to as eminent domain. This clause ensures that property owners are not deprived of their property without just monetary compensation. The purpose is to protect individual property rights while allowing the government to carry out projects that benefit the public, such as infrastructure development.
Can the executor not sell a house that is in a living trust willed to three people other than themselves?
This question has so many mixed and conflicting terms, that it is difficult to even understand the question, much less provide an answer. This answer will assume the probable situation that creates this question. I assume that the "property" that has been "willed" to 3 people is part of a living trust created by the decedent during his lifetime. If the decedent transferred this property to a living trust, the executor has no power at all to sell it. This is because the executor has power over property belonging to the decedent. This property is owned by the living trust, therefore, beyond the authority of the executor. Once the decedent transferred the property to the trust, the trust became the legal owner just as if the decedent had transferred the property to another person. Since the decedent no longer owns the property, he has no more power to "will" that property to anyone than I have to will your property to someone. Unless the trust provides that upon his death the property goes into his own estate the executor is powerless to sell to anyone. But this would be extremely unlikely, because the purpose of the living trust is to keep that property out of the decedent's estate.
Was Cleopatra important in Italy?
Ordinarily, Cleopatra would not have been important in Italy. To the Romans she was just another ruler, although they had a protectorate over Egypt which had been willed to them on several occasions. However in the power struggle between Octavian and Antony, she became important. Octavian used her as a source for the civil war that brought him to sole power.Ordinarily, Cleopatra would not have been important in Italy. To the Romans she was just another ruler, although they had a protectorate over Egypt which had been willed to them on several occasions. However in the power struggle between Octavian and Antony, she became important. Octavian used her as a source for the civil war that brought him to sole power.Ordinarily, Cleopatra would not have been important in Italy. To the Romans she was just another ruler, although they had a protectorate over Egypt which had been willed to them on several occasions. However in the power struggle between Octavian and Antony, she became important. Octavian used her as a source for the civil war that brought him to sole power.Ordinarily, Cleopatra would not have been important in Italy. To the Romans she was just another ruler, although they had a protectorate over Egypt which had been willed to them on several occasions. However in the power struggle between Octavian and Antony, she became important. Octavian used her as a source for the civil war that brought him to sole power.Ordinarily, Cleopatra would not have been important in Italy. To the Romans she was just another ruler, although they had a protectorate over Egypt which had been willed to them on several occasions. However in the power struggle between Octavian and Antony, she became important. Octavian used her as a source for the civil war that brought him to sole power.Ordinarily, Cleopatra would not have been important in Italy. To the Romans she was just another ruler, although they had a protectorate over Egypt which had been willed to them on several occasions. However in the power struggle between Octavian and Antony, she became important. Octavian used her as a source for the civil war that brought him to sole power.Ordinarily, Cleopatra would not have been important in Italy. To the Romans she was just another ruler, although they had a protectorate over Egypt which had been willed to them on several occasions. However in the power struggle between Octavian and Antony, she became important. Octavian used her as a source for the civil war that brought him to sole power.Ordinarily, Cleopatra would not have been important in Italy. To the Romans she was just another ruler, although they had a protectorate over Egypt which had been willed to them on several occasions. However in the power struggle between Octavian and Antony, she became important. Octavian used her as a source for the civil war that brought him to sole power.Ordinarily, Cleopatra would not have been important in Italy. To the Romans she was just another ruler, although they had a protectorate over Egypt which had been willed to them on several occasions. However in the power struggle between Octavian and Antony, she became important. Octavian used her as a source for the civil war that brought him to sole power.
Should individuals be allowed to own property or should property be owned by the government?
This is completely dependent on your beliefs. If all property is owned by the government, you have no safety from the government controlling your life. If they wish to use your location of residence for something else, then they can force you to move elsewhere. If property is owned privately, the property that could be used in better ways, but the owner is too stubborn to sell it, will just be wasted property. Both have benefits and both have faults.
Can the government take private property from an individual according to the fifth amendment?
Yes, the government can take private property from an individual according to the Fifth Amendment, but only if it is for public use and the individual is provided with just compensation.
Your mother died 10 years ago and you continued to live in the house that she willed to you and your siblings you cotinued to pay NJ property taxes As executrix you never changed the deed Is this frau?
No. Technically, the deed does not have to be changed, because a will is an instrument of transfer. Just as a deed transfers property from a living person, a will transfers property from a deceased person. In many cases, estate deeds are made but that is only to confirm the transfer in the deed records. As long as your living in te house has been open to the other co-owners, there is no problem.
