If they have 'probable cause' their entry is notunlawful, providing it is done in response to legal requirements and in a lawful means. There are several legal reasons for police to enter without a warrant (e.g.: 'exigent' [emergency] circumstances - fresh pursuit of a suspect - criminal activity being conducted in "plain view" - etc - etc). Afterwards they will have to justify their entry in court in order to utilize "the fruits" of their entry.
Under no circumstances can a police officer stop you or search you without probable cause. Probable cause is one of the ways that an ordinary citizen's right to privacy is protected from unlawful search and seizure.
The police officer has to have probable cause to believe a particular person commited the crime in question. In court, probable cause is NOT enough to convict you of the same crime.
have probable cause to believe that a crime is being committed.
I think "probable cause" is the legal term.
Probable cause.
If they have probable cause.
They don't need 'probable cause', just a 'reasonable suspicion'.
Probable cause.
In general, police can search your trunk without a warrant or probable cause if they have your consent or if they believe there is evidence of a crime in the trunk.
Yes, police can arrest you at your workplace if they have a warrant or probable cause to do so.
Probable cause supported by evidence/testimony that the accused committed the statutorily unlawful act with which they are accused.
probable cause