No, they are their if the community does not like the new law. That is when they can protest to over throw the law. Only the legislature can decide to make a new law that goes to the President either to pass it or to veto.
The supreme court decided to throw out the case.
A concurring opinion
They can but it has to be ratified by the president and supreme court. (the Supreme Court has nothing to do with passing laws. They only rule on laws that are already passed.)
Justice (or Chief Justice) [full name] Supreme Court of the United States One First Street N.E. Washington, DC 20543
A Supreme Court justice may choose to write a concurring opinion when he or she agrees with the majority decision, but wants to add perceptions or legal reasoning not addressed, or not addressed to that justice's satisfaction, in the majority opinion (opinion of the Court).
I need to find a supreme court case based on the second amendment and write an essay contrasting two Court Justice's opinions.
The President has the ability to appoint justices to the Supreme Court (and lower federal courts) with the "advice and consent of the Senate" that share his (or her) ideology. Judicial appointment to lower Article III courts can also be considered a means of influencing the Supreme Court, as the lower courts handle far more cases and have the opportunity to write opinions that have persuasive authority.
the supreme court uses the judicial review to check the powers of the legislative and executive branches
add points to the majority opinion
To dissent; if the justices disagree with the majority opinion, they write a dissenting opinion.
No one would write a dissenting opinion.
Yes, Sandra Day O'Connor, the first female justice of the United States Supreme Court, has written several books. Some of her notable works include "The Majesty of the Law: Reflections of a Supreme Court Justice" and "Out of Order: Stories from the History of the Supreme Court."