Yes, because they could change their mind about some of the people running and then they change the way they run and the their lifestyle is changed.
Answer: Voting leads to putting new and different people in office.
The voting requirements change that affected the 1828 election was the relaxation of the property qualification for voting. This lead to more people voting in this election, and led to Andrew Jackson's election to the presidency.
amendment
It is a weapon in the sense that it represents your voice. It is your input and participation in democracy. Democracy is a government by the people and for the people. Therefore if you don't like how your government is run, change it by voting.
People will be able to vote in languages other than English.
That voting is ineffective
1800s
by voting I believe people run for office to make there own impact and change the ways things are (good or bad)
No, direct action activism, mobilizing people in large numbers, and being a big company with big money to buy off politicians are all ways in which change happens. Voting, however, is not one of them =)
Stopping certain people from voting (apex)
No cons of voting, just cons of uneducated/biased/racist/etc people voting
The candidates could bribe the people voting.