War is typically defined as a conflict involving the use of force, which often includes weapons. However, it is possible to have conflicts or disagreements that are resolved without resorting to armed combat. Diplomacy, negotiations, economic measures, and international institutions can all be used to address disputes and avoid the use of weapons in resolving conflicts.
major wars fought by U.S.
In the 1700s, wars were typically fought using armies that consisted of infantry, cavalry, and artillery. Infantry soldiers were the backbone of the army and fought on foot with muskets. Cavalry soldiers fought on horseback and were typically used for reconnaissance and charges. Artillery was used to bombard enemy positions with cannons. Battles were fought in open fields or fortified positions, and strategies such as flanking, sieges, and frontal assaults were commonly employed.
i beleive it was the war of 1812. and the vietnam war.
One reason was nuclear weapons, the other was a war without qaurtier
martin Luther king jr fought for his rights and for people of color to be treated equaly.
Every war that the US has fought except WW2 were fought entirely without using any nuclear weapons.
Total war is all out war; using all weapons available. The Korean War and Vietnam Wars were not total wars; they were LIMITED wars...limited to non-nuclear conventional weapons. Total wars can no longer be fought in this age of atomic weapons, without risking "mutually assured destruction."
Wars fought by industrial nations (world powers/civilized nations/etc. etc.) after 1945 cannot be full fledged all out wars (more simply referred to as "total wars"). Because of MAD, mutually assured destruction from atomic weapons. Wars fought prior to 1945 (prior to the invention of nuclear weapons) could be fought as total wars. Total War=Anything goes
That in the atomic age (atomic weapons) only limited wars can be fought. Nuclear weapons would mean total war.
The advent (arrival) of nuclear weapons in 1945 (Hiroshima & Nagasaki) negated (nullified or invalidated) declared total wars. No longer could wars be fought with ALL available weapons (e.g. atomic bombs) without the risk of "mutually assured destruction." Consequently, only wars "Limited" to the use of conventional (non-atomic) weapons would or could be used.
they fought with swords and other weapons they fought with swords and other weapons they fought with swords and other weapons
Presidents (Commander in Chiefs) now knew they could NO LONGER declare TOTAL WARS; in the age of nuclear weapons, wars had to be fought as LIMITED WARS...limited to "non-nuclear weapons." Such as Korea & Vietnam...to stem the tide of communism.
Because of nuclear weapons, only "limited wars" could be fought; limited to conventional non-atomic weapons. WW2 was the US's last declared war; and atomic weapons did NOT exist when that war was declared. A declaration of war implies TOTAL war; which uses ALL available weapons to win! Total declared wars cannot be fought in the atomic age, without risking "mutually assured destruction." Hence, the cold war; a military stand-off between two sets of nuclear armed nations.
Yes there can be peace without religion. Too many wars have been fought because of religion.
Fight wars without the use of nuclear weapons; limited wars.
The Atomic Age created the cold war. With nuclear weapons, total wars (such as WW2) could no longer be fought. Only limited wars such as the Korean War and Vietnam Wars could be fought. Limited to only CONVENTIONAL weapons (Non-nuclear).
No wars were fought in Utah in 1860.