No, it would give rise to misunderstandings.
"is' is present tense. For past tense use was or were.
I used the past tense to answer this question.
'Who' is a pronoun, it doesn't have a past tense. But you can use the word "was" as in "who was on the phone?".
Depending on how you use the words some are already in the past tense. Got is the past tense of get. Present: I will get a dog. Past: I got a dog. With is a general term. It doesn't change in the past tense. Had is the past tense of has and had. Depending on which style of past you are using [progressive, perfect, progressive perfect, simple] will dictate how you use the word.
The past continuous tense.
You use the past tense form which is 'had'.
Is can be used in the past tense if it's in its past tense form, which is was.
"is' is present tense. For past tense use was or were.
The past tense is involved.
I used the past tense to answer this question.
'Who' is a pronoun, it doesn't have a past tense. But you can use the word "was" as in "who was on the phone?".
No. The word "are" is present or future tense. The past tense would be "were".
Would is the past tense for will
The past tense of "conference" is "conferenced." For example, "We conferenced with our colleagues yesterday to discuss the project."
No, the past tense is always put.
is - is present tense. He is from China. was - is past tense. He was sick last week.
You have to you have in present tense. You had to use had to write that sentence- use had in past tense.