No, because your drawings of the protected characters are derivative works of the characters, which is one of the exclusive rights of the copyright holder.
If the use is clearly parody or commentary, you might be able to defend the use as fair, but it would be very risky to rely on that. You would want to talk to an experienced copyright attorney before going in that direction.
Transfer by assignment, when speaking of copyrights, is when a copyright owner transfer's his ownership over to another person or company. This is usually done by filling out a form that is found at the Copyright Office, signing the original owner's copyright over to another person after registration. In other words, they 'assign' the original owner's rights over to someone else.
In the manga, "Fruits Basket Another," a sequel to the original series, we see some of the original characters reunite and interact with a new generation of characters. Whether all the characters from the original "Fruits Basket" series meet again depends on how you define "everyone."
Depends upon what you mean by "go by". If you're trying to determine when a copyright expires, then the original publication date may be a factor for the contents of the original edition and later dates may apply to materials changed or added in later editions. The copyright owner is under no obligation to point out what, if anything, has changed from one edition to another.
If they did not take the photographs then no they don't. The copyright to any work is held by the original author unless he/she assigns them to another party. The only exception is when something is created under a "work-for-hire" contract.
A parallel character is another character (in the same piece of literature or another) that is very similar if not almost exactly the same as the original character chosen.
Cartoon faces are sometimes caricatures. These are drawings that exaggerate or simplify certain features without changing the original face so much that it becomes unrecognizable.
An original character is a unique and new fictional creation made by an individual, typically in the context of storytelling, such as in literature, movies, or video games. These characters are not based on existing intellectual property and are the product of the creator's imagination.
Drawing is not an invention. Before the alphabet was created, people sometimes use drawings as characters in order to communicate with one another. In Chinese history, people used simple sketches as Chinese characters. So, the Chinese characters seen nowadays are like pictures and is easy to recognise, unlike long ago, which is rather messy.
No, Harry Potter is an original idea that uses mythological creatures and other fantasy characters.
The copyright date on something is when it was CREATED or first published, and the copyright lasts for about a hundred years after the author's death, so YES, anything with valid copyright date of 2002 or 1993 are till in effect. On the other hand, it is a good question whether a famous painting still has its own copyright and whether a photograph or digitization of that famous painting may have its OWN copyright dates, as derivative works of the original.
It is the sequel series to Tokyo Mew Mew, it is not the original and they introduce a new enemy and a couple new characters.
That is both copyright infringement and plagiarism.