Where Jesus appeared after the resurrection depends on which gospel we rely on for information:
Mark's Gospel
Starting with Mark's Gospel, as this was the first New Testament gospel to be written, the earliest manuscripts end at verse 16:8, with the young man saying that Jesus is risen, and the women fleeing in terror, telling no one. Jesus did not appear on earth after his death and resurrection.
The "Long Ending" (verses 16:9-25) was added much later to provide three resurrection appearances that harmonise as far as possible with the other gospels.
Matthew's Gospel
Luke's Gospel
John's Gospel
In this account, four appearances.
Mark Mark's Gospel was the first canonical gospel, written approximately 70 CE. The earliest known manuscripts of Mark do not even have a resurrection narrative, beyond the young man telling the women that Jesus had risen. The "Long Ending", added by later interpolators, adds resurrection appearance to bring this gospel more or less into line with the Gospels of Matthew and Luke. first of all, he appeared to two as they walked along the road - these could be either the two women of Matthew or the two men of Luke. He then appeared to the disciples while they ate.
Matthew In Matthew's Gospel the women, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary, saw Jesus later while on the way to tell the disciples of their experience. Finally, the eleven disciples went to a mountain in Galilee and saw Jesus.
Luke In Luke's Gospel, Jesus appeared to two men, Cleopas and (presumably) Peter, but they did not recognise him, even after conversing with him, inviting him home, and eating dinner with him. They only assumed that he was Jesus based on his words and behaviour, but then he vanished out of their sight. At his next appearance, Jesus went to some lengths to assure them that he really was Jesus, showing the disciples his wounds, and finally being drawn up into heaven. All this happened in and near Jerusalem, not in Galilee.
John In John's Gospel, Mary Magdalene saw Jesus standing and knew not that it was Jesus, supposing that he was the gardener. The next two appearances, in a room in Jerusalem, are quite similar to a single appearance in Luke's Gospel except, as Elaine Pagels points out in Beyond Belief: The Secret Gospel of Thomas (2003), the two accounts seems intended to disadvantage the disciple Thomas, by causing him to miss the blessing of the Holy Spirit and then appear to doubt that it was Jesus that he saw [Pagels identifies a thread of anti-Thomas narrative in John's Gospel.]. Finally, Jesus appeared to the disciples at the Sea of Tiberius but, although 'the disciple whom Jesus loved' quickly identified him, none of them dared to ask who he was, presumably meaning that his identity was still not obvious to them all.
The contradictions among the various gospel stories mean that scholars believe that no one was really a reliable witness to Jesus' resurrection appearances. Moreover, there is nothing that James wrote, or even attributed to James, that mentions the resurrection of Jesus. If James did actually see the risen Jesus, he left us nothing to tell of his experience.
John's purpose in recording the resurrection of Jesus and His appearances to the different people was to demonstrate that Jesus' physical and bodily resurrection was the crowning proof that He truly is the Messiah and Son of God who laid down His life for His own people, past, present, and future. John believed and he wanted others to believe also.
The gospels do not show that the resurrection of Jesus was historical. In fact, the widely divergent descriptions of the appearances of the risen Jesus do more to suggest that it was not historical. At the very least, the discrepancies in the different stories show that they really knew nothing about it.
The earliest manuscripts of Mark's Gospel end at verse 16:8, with the young man saying that Jesus is risen, and the women fleeing in terror, telling no one. Clearly the resurrection is important, because the "Long Ending" (verses 16:9-25) was added much later to provide resurrection appearances. Although each gospel provides quite different accounts of just what happened after the resurrection of Jesus, Christians believe that the resurrection means that Jesus is the Son of God.
A:In his epistles, Paul seems to have believed in a spiritual resurrection of Jesus, in other words believing that the resurrection and the ascension to heaven were one and the same. When he describes the appearances of Jesus to Cephas, James and the disciples, he makes no distinction with the presumably spiritual or even allegorical appearance to himself. Paul never seems to believe that the risen Jesus could be seen in the flesh. The New Testament gospels speak of a physical resurrection, because the body of Jesus was no longer in the tomb and they go to great pains to prove that Jesus' resurrection was real and in the flesh.
No. They did not believe in a resurrection, and Jesus is the resurrection and the life, (John 11.25)
Try the list at the related link, below. Interestingly, the list lacks Jesus' resurrection... which would make 37 in all. Scripture references for Jesus' resurrection are: Matt 28:1 and following; Mark 16:2 and following; Luke 24:1 and following; John 20:1 and following.
After the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Angels announced the resurrection of Jesus (Mark 16:1-8)
Not sure what you mean, but unless question is made clearer, candles are not a resurrection of Jesus.
On Easter many celebrate the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Jesus said I am the life and the resurrection.