Answer:
If you were yourself a car owner and maintained Personal Injury Protection on your own car, you may have a claim for benefits under certain defined circumstances. Personal Injury Protection coverage is sometimes referred to as "no-fault coverage" and pays a portion of your medical expenses and lost wages as a result of a motor vehicle mishap, irrespective of who caused the incident.
Very broadly, if it can be shown that the incident occurred in such a way that it was connected to your operation of your car, you may have an arguable claim to benefits against your own Personal Injury Protection coverage. If the insurer denies the claim, you may wish to consider suit against the insurer. That said, State court decisions differ on how close the nexus must be between the operation of your vehicle and the resulting injury, so every matter is considered on its own facts.
As far as suing the shooter's insurer, many States have statutes that preclude "direct actions". This means that the injured party may not sue directly the insurer of the person who did the harm. Instead, that person must be sued, and in many cases, his/her insurer cannot even be named in the lawsuit.
Furthermore, most insurance policies specifically exclude coverage for intentional acts, which a drive-by shooting would seem to be. Therefore, the insurer would probably be able to "deny coverage" to its insured because the act was not within the scope of the risks assumed by the insured. That is, a liability insurance policy usually only provides coverage for negligent (careless) acts, not intentional ones. Accordingly, it may not be worthwhile for the injured party to file suit unless the person who did the shooting had assets from which to satisfy the claim.
you can't sue him if he had your permission to drive car. you need to collect from your insurance company. if you don't have insurance - you're outta luck.
yes. you can sue an at fault driver if his insurance company refuses to pay your claim. it would not be proper to sue the insurance company.
No, since the insurance company would have been damaged by the act, not you. You have no standing to sue. On the other hand, your insurance company can sue- and can pursue criminal charges.
You are required by law to have liabilty coverage, but not collision coverage. If you did not have collision coverage then you are not due any compensation by your insurance company. If you did have collision insurance and the insurance company will not pay, then you may be able to sue the insurance company, but you cannot sue the state.
Yah of course
the insurance company!
You don't. You sue the individual. The insurance company is obligated to take care of the obligations of the individual.
If it is your car, get insurence. If it is not, sue them.
You do not sue the insurance company. Any suit is filed against the at fault party only. The insurance company will defend their client and pay damages according to the terms of the policy.
It is your choice. However, it is advised to sue the other company.
You can.
Probably. When you purchase insurance, you are insuring the car. If you drive someone else's car and have an accident, their insurance should cover the costs (but their insurance *may* sue your insurance company for compensation/reimbursement.)