No.
Some argue that the electoral college provides an advantage to smaller states with fewer electoral votes, as it gives them proportionally more influence in the presidential election compared to their population size.
A candidate can win the popular vote but lose the election if they receive more votes from the general public but fewer electoral votes from the Electoral College. The Electoral College system in the United States determines the winner of the presidential election based on the number of electoral votes each candidate receives, rather than the total number of popular votes nationwide.
Barack Obama won the 2012 presidential election defeating Mitt Romney. In the 2012 presidential election Barack Obama received 332 electoral votes and Mitt Romney received 206 electoral votes. The popular vote totals were Obama 65,446,032 and Romney 60,589,084.
In the 2008 election, Barrack Obama received 365 electoral votes. In the 2012 election, he received 332 electoral votes.
Maine currently controls four of the 538 electoral votes, which is about 0.74% of the votes. That may seem low, but more than half of the states each controls eight votes or fewer.
Because of the electoral college.The way US Presidential elections work is that the candidate who wins the popular vote in a state receives all the electoral votes of that state (there are a couple of states that do it differently, but most of them are "winner take all").It doesn't matter if you win in that state by one vote or unanimously, you get all the electoral votes. So if you win the states you win by large margins and lose the states you lose by small margins, it's entirely possible for the overall number of votes to show you as the winner, but for you to lose due to receiving fewer electoral votes than your opponent.
In a federal election in the United States, a candidate does not need to receive a majority of the popular votes to win. For example, in the Electoral College system used for presidential elections, a candidate only needs to secure a majority of electoral votes (at least 270 out of 538) to win. This means that a candidate can win the presidency by obtaining fewer than 50% of the popular vote, as seen in past elections.
President Obama won re-election with 332 electoral votes over Republican challenger Mitt Romney, who had 206. He thus became the first president since Franklin D. Roosevelt to win another term with fewer electoral votes than in a previous election. Obama received 365 electoral votes in 2008. Obama also became the first Democratic presidential candidate since FDR to win two elections with more than 50 percent of the vote.
Fewer people voted for him.
The Electoral College is a mechanism established by the U.S. Constitution for electing the president and vice president. An example of the Electoral College in action occurred during the 2016 presidential election, when Donald Trump won the presidency by securing 304 electoral votes, despite losing the popular vote to Hillary Clinton, who received about 2.9 million more votes nationwide. Each state is allocated a number of electoral votes based on its representation in Congress, which can lead to scenarios where the candidate with fewer popular votes still wins the presidency through the electoral vote system.
President Bush won the election over Carry even though Carry had more of the popular vote President Bush won with more electoral college votes; even though the electoral college is supposed to represent the peoples views.
Your vote "counts" more in a mayoral election because cities have fewer residents than the states in which they reside, and turnout for such elections is low compared to gubernatorial and presidential elections; because of the way the Electoral College works, however, if your state is expected to be close in support for one presidential candidate or the other, while your governor or mayor is popular enough to easily be re-elected, your vote may count more in a marginal sense.