answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The correct meaning of the italicized words "al norte" in the sentence is "to the north."

User Avatar

AnswerBot

3d ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Choose the correct meaning of the italicized words in the following sentence. El parque est and aacute al norte de la ciudad.?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Which is the best meaning of the italicized word in this sentence The wanderer's eagerness to work again was overwhelming?

a.enthusiasm


What is the correct grammar for the following sentence you then went to the beach or then you went to the beach?

Both are correct with ever so slightly different meaning.


Does the sentence you do do that have correct grammar?

no_____If the sentence is You do do that (meaning You are in the habit of doing that) the grammar is perfectly correct and the sentence 'does have correct grammar'.


If the sentence to be is a correct sentence what is its meaning?

It means it must be grammatically correct. The word spellings and the structure should be correct too.


How do you use Lebensraum in a sentence?

A German word meaning "living space", the term "lebensraum" would most properly be italicized or placed in quotation marks when used in an English sentence. Thus, just one example-sentence would be the following: "In 1941, in pursuit of the 'lebensraum' which they eyed covetously to the east, the Germans invaded the Soviet Union."


What is the correct grammar for the following sentence you want to improve your ability of reading?

With a slight difference in meaning, use either "ability to read" or "ability in reading."


Is 'You shall tread through better times in the future' a correct sentence?

This sentence is grammatically correct but does not have much meaning.


Is the sentence The entire atmosphere drifted into doze. correct?

The sentence appears to have no meaning. So I would say it is not correct.


Which is correct grammar-closely following or following closely?

Both phrases are correct, but "following closely" is more commonly used and is generally preferred. It is a more natural word order in English and flows better when spoken or written.


How would you correct the following sentence so that the intended meaning of the modifier is clear Delirious with happiness the good news spread as the friends shared their excitement?

Corrected sentence: Delirious with happiness, the friends shared their excitement as the good news spread.


What is it for me is this correct?

Are you asking if the sentence 'What is it for me?' is grammatically correct? If so, the answer is 'no'. Here are some variations on that sentence which are grammatically correct, but of course I don't know if any of them is what you meant to say. 'What is in it for me?' (meaning 'What benefit will I get out of it?') 'What is it about me?' (meaning 'What is it about me that causes certain things to keep happening to me?') (Compare 'What is it with me?') 'What is there for me?' (meaning 'Which of those things are intended for me?' or 'How much of that is intended for me?')


What is correct to those who are or for those who are?

It is important to respect and acknowledge the individuality and autonomy of those who are. It is essential to listen to their perspectives, honor their choices, and provide support based on their unique needs and preferences.