magnificence
The emperors who were known for cruelty were caligula and Commodus.
Emperor Caligula was banned from attending events at the Colosseum due to his erratic behavior and cruelty towards the people of Rome.
He has been described as a noble and moderate ruler for the first six months of his reign. After this he reverted to cruelty, sadism and extravagance suggesting that he was an insane tyrant. In AD41 he was assassinated
Caligula's reign was marked by erratic behavior and extreme cruelty, which alienated both the political elite and the general populace. His lavish spending and extravagant projects strained the Roman economy, leading to widespread dissatisfaction. Additionally, his tendency to execute or exile potential rivals undermined political stability and loyalty within the Senate and military. Ultimately, his unpredictable leadership style and disregard for established governance contributed to his downfall.
Cruelty to horses
One historical figure often cited for their wickedness without notable accomplishments is Caligula, the Roman Emperor known for his tyrannical rule and infamous acts of cruelty. His reign was marked by extravagance and brutality, overshadowing any potential achievements he may have made. Caligula's legacy is primarily defined by his erratic behavior and the chaos he brought to the Roman Empire, rather than any significant contributions to governance or society.
Rome had always had its fair share of bad emperors. Caligula, Nero, Commodus are such examples. In a time when Left-handed people were considered unlucky, Emperor Caligula often appeared in public dressed in women's clothing. His favorite horse, Incitatus, lived in a marble stable, with an ivory manger. Caligula also tried to make him a consul the highest elected office of the Roman Republic and the most important job in the government. All classical accounts of Gaius 'Caligula' agree that he possessed elements of madness, cruelty, viciousness, extravagance and megalomania. He is described as a coarse and cruel despot with an extraordinary passion for sadism and a fierce energy. He could get extremely excited and angry. Caligula was tall, spindly, pale and prematurely bald. He was so sensitive about his lack of hair that it was a capital crime for anyone to look down from a high place as Caligula passed by. Sometimes he ordered those with a fine head of hair to be shaved. He made up for lack of hair on his head by an abundance of body-hair. About this too he could be equally sensitive; even the mention of "hairy goats" in conversation was dangerous. He used to grimace, which he practiced in front of a mirror, and he was an impressive orator. His great-uncle, the Emperor Tiberius, once said: 'There was never a better slave not a worse master than Caligula.
The suffix of "cruelty" is "-ty".
Cruelty is a noun.
The reign of Caligula is mostly noted for his cruelty, sadism and sexual perversion. He worked very hard at removing any legal restraints that prevented the emperor from exercising unconstrained power. He spent lavishly on luxurious housing for himself. However, he did annex the Kingdom of Mauretania, and constructed two new aqueducts during his reign. He was assassinated in 41 AD by his Praetorian Guard.
Julius Caesar was not an emperor. Throughout his lifetime Rome was still a republic. Neither was he bad. He was extremely popular among the people who saw his as the hero of the people. This was the real foundation of his power. Caligula's reign started well, but it was said that he became mad after recovering from an illness. It was also said that he became cruel, but some historians think that these accounts might be exaggerated. The one emperor whose reign was one of crushing cruelty was Commodus.
There are no definitive historical accounts that confirm Caligula systematically cut off people's limbs. However, ancient sources describe his reign as marked by extreme cruelty and erratic behavior, which included a variety of brutal acts. Some accounts suggest he inflicted severe punishments on his enemies and perceived threats, but details may be exaggerated or sensationalized by historians. Overall, while he was known for his violence, specific claims about limb amputations are not well-documented.