0
Clothing is not something that the courts have been willing to define as necessary?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
falce
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Courts generally do not define clothing as a necessity because it is considered a basic human need for protecting one's body and maintaining social decency. While there may be some variations in what is considered "necessary" across different contexts and cultures, courts generally recognize that clothing is essential for personal dignity, comfort, and protection in most circumstances.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is punishment in courts of law necessary?
It depends on the crime
In SCI Fayette prison in Pennsylvania both parties must be present to sign at the clerk of courts is there a clerk of courts willing to come to the prison to perform license procedure?
no.
What are the conditions necessary to prevent the courts of justice from endangering the general liberties of the people?
The courts needed to be separated from both the legislative and executive powers.
What international court was Serbia willing to submit her dispute with austria?
One of the international courts in the Hague, the Netherlands.
Why is it necessary for the courts to interpret our legal rights under the constitution?
The courts are required to say what is right and wrong in a matter. With incidents coming up they can resolve it.
Something courts do with parole statements?
bar testimony
When did American courts begin to implement the Bill of Rights?
American courts didn't 'implement' the Bill of Rights. The approval of the necessary states made it law and that would be enforced by the executive branch and the courts would have supported it.
Can someone sue a FORMER employee for embezzlement. Why?
Embezzlement is a crime prosecuted by criminal courts. No lawsuit is necessary.
What doctrine that was based upon the United states supreme courts interpretation of the necessary and proper clause is?
enumerated
Activist judges believes that the courts should?
Activist judges believe that the courts should play a more active role in policy making and be willing to strike down federal laws, whereas judges favoring restraint believe that the courts should defer to the elected branches of government.
Why is it necessary that the judicial court be men in words honor and dignity?
It is not necessary for the judicial courts to be men. Women play an active role in every judicial system in the Western World. There is no reason to keep them from participating in any judicial system.It is not necessary for the judicial courts to be men. Women play an active role in every judicial system in the Western World. There is no reason to keep them from participating in any judicial system.It is not necessary for the judicial courts to be men. Women play an active role in every judicial system in the Western World. There is no reason to keep them from participating in any judicial system.It is not necessary for the judicial courts to be men. Women play an active role in every judicial system in the Western World. There is no reason to keep them from participating in any judicial system.
What are the courts-martial?
Trying Members that did something against the military law
