Most authors who have considered the realized
and potential benefits of marine protected areas
have concluded that, if nothing else, such areas
can perform a valuable education and research
function. Marine mammals are ideal "flagship
species" because of the great popular interest in
and affection for them (e.g., see Lavigne et al.
1999). As a result, protected areas inhabited by
marine mammals have the potential to draw
people's attention and engage them in broader
conservation dialogue, and also to attract support
for conservation-related research. Duffus and
Dearden (1993a) conclude concerning the
Canadian context: "Marine parks themselves play
only a minor role in protection; their significance
is in public education." This significance may be
crucial to conservation, but it is extremely difficult
to demonstrate or quantify. It is also uncertain
whether public support can be maintained for a
marine protected area that performs no regulatory
(i.e., protection) function.
we can save the biodiversity by planting trees & save animals also
they dont focus on anything people
biosphere reserves
They are in Endangered
The Laughing Kookaburra is not endangered. Its conservation status in Australia, federally, is "Secure", and its IUCN conservation status is "Least concern".
Its the protection of endangered species
The mahogany glider is not endangered. Its conservation status is "threatened".
Critically Endangered
Grey kangaroos are not endangered. Their conservation status is listed as "least concern".
no but the white rhino was critically endangered but thanks to conservation now they are alive
Yes. But they are actually vulnerable, a conservation status almost as bad as endangered.
Polar bear conservation status is listed as "Vulnerable" with the next status being "Endangered."