No
District courts hear cases on topics assigned to them by Congress, and federal courts hear cases regarding constitutional law and treaties.
State boundaries
Becasue they are the lowest level state courts in the state judicial system - courts of "original jurisdiction' which hear cases within their assigned judicial "circuit."
Conducts routine hearings assigned by federal judges.
Some municipal courts are known as 'Courts of General Session' - such a judge would probably be a municipal judge assigned to the bench in that court.
For US and most state Distict Courts - there is no set number of judges assigned. There is a sufficient number assigned to hear the caseload of that paricular court but since they all hear cases individually and no cases are heard "En Banc" at District Court level the number of judges assigned to that particular court is not germaine.
A fair comment may be regarded as malicious if it is made with ill intent or a disregard for the truth, particularly when the commenter has knowledge that the statement is false or misleading. Additionally, if the comment is based on fabricated facts or if it is made to harm someone's reputation rather than to express an opinion on a matter of public interest, it may be deemed malicious. The context, tone, and motive behind the comment play crucial roles in determining its perceived malice. Ultimately, courts will assess whether the comment was made in good faith or with the intent to harm.
No, if you are each a different state you cannot comment or refuse to accept decisions of different state courts.
Not a true statement. Trial Courts do NOT hear appeals. That function is assigned to the Court of Appeals.
Becasue they are the lowest level state courts in the state judicial system - courts of "original jurisdiction' which hear cases within their assigned judicial "circuit."
The Social Security Administration.
Courts.