Want this question answered?
Mass and damping are associated with the motion of a dynamic system. Degrees-of-freedom with mass or damping are often called dynamic degrees-of-freedom; degrees-of-freedom with stiffness are called static degrees-of-freedom. It is possible (and often desirable) in models of complex systems to have fewer dynamic degrees-of-freedom than static degrees-of-freedom.
a superstructure has negative degree of freedom... ;0
There is no direct relationship between degrees of freedom and probability values.
One could argue from a purely philosophical standpoint that freedom can never be absolute as we are all products of both our nurture and nature. It could be argued that it must follow therefore that there is an element of predetermination to our actions. This broad category (history, politics & society) does cover philosophy but I can not be certain that you are meaning the question in this sense. Therefore, ignoring a philosophical debate, the simple answer is that freedom is not absolute as society has found that it functions best when there are laws to govern (and therefore restrict and control) people's behaviour.
Yes. The parameters of the t distribution are mean, variance and the degree of freedom. The degree of freedom is equal to n-1, where n is the sample size. As a rule of thumb, above a sample size of 100, the degrees of freedom will be insignificant and can be ignored, by using the normal distribution. Some textbooks state that above 30, the degrees of freedom can be ignored.
only you can answer that question.
The Attorney General, Robert Kennedy, sent John Seigenthaler to accompany the Freedom Riders
The Attorney General, Robert Kennedy, sent John Seigenthaler to accompany the Freedom Riders
The Kennedy administration supported the Freedom Riders' right to protest nonviolently against segregation on interstate buses. They intervened to protect the Freedom Riders when they faced violent attacks in the South and enforced federal laws to ensure their safety. The administration also ordered the Interstate Commerce Commission to ban segregation in bus and train stations in response to the Freedom Riders' efforts.
freedom of press, freedom of religion and freedom to petition
Freedom Rides
if i understand the question correctly three are freedom of speech, press, and freedom of religion. hope this answers it ok
There are a few universal questions that are universal like the freedom from oppression and the freedom of religion .
FREEDOM is not doing what we should. Doing as we should is possibly self concessional righteousness....coming from an atheist though.
The answer to this question is no, most slaves did not have the freedom to have pets.
Dred Scott was a slave who tried to sue for his freedom in the famous Dred Scott v. Sandford case in 1857. The Supreme Court ruled against him, stating that as a black person, he was not entitled to citizenship and therefore could not sue in a federal court. The decision further exacerbated tensions between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions in the United States.
Yes.Answer 2The question needs to be qualified, i.e. freedom to do what? or freedom from what? For example, in Istanbul, the media is relatively free. Religious worship is generally free. However, there is no freedom for civilians to carry weapons.