In animal testing, countless animals are experimented on and then killed after their use. Others are injured and will live the remainder of their lives in captivity. The unfortunate aspect is that many of these animals received tests for substances that will never actually be approved or used by the public. This aspect shows the idea that the animals die in vain because no direct benefit to humans occurred from this testing. There's also an argument that the reaction of a drug in an animal's body has quite a different reaction from the reaction in a human's.
Animal testing has saved many lifes. Yea it may not be the best thing out there, but it saved my mothers life, and i would like the animals would tested the drug.
the cons of animal testing r- costs bunches of $$$
No. There is no legal requirement for animal testing.
if you believe in animal testing...you have no morals,,,i no this because i just wrote a 5 page paper on animal testing and its horrid
Some dogs are used for animal testing. yes
Animal testing is legal because animal testing has been used to cure some of the deadliest ailments. Animals used in testing are also mostly rats and mice, who have safe, comfortable homes.
Pro: living organism model Con: violates the animal's rights inefficient and ineffective, their anatomy and biological reactions are not the same (look up the thalidomide tragedy)
everything about animal abuse is con, nothing has ever (or has been) good about it.
hey well www.ppaww.org has stuff about animal testing and petitoosn and a list of companies that test =)
do the benefits of animal testing outweigh the financial costs? -apex
Animal testing is legal because animal testing has been used to cure some of the deadliest ailments. Animals used in testing are also mostly rats and mice, who have safe, comfortable homes.
i dont no. do some research /:
How much does the animal weigh?