A producer could continue to produce without the presence or interaction of consumers. For example: Bees will continue to make honey as long as they can access what they need as consumers to then become producers of honey. A bear, as a consumer, will not die if he doesn't consume the honey, as long as the bear can access other food sources as a consumer. But if a consumer must rely on one type of producer, and that producer fails to produce, the consumer would either need to find other sources of nutrients to consume, or if unable to find/adapt to other sources, the consumer would die.
No. Producers, i.e. organisms which photosynthesise, are the only way that energy can enter a food chain, the only way that food can start out. There's an old saying: 'All flesh is grass', which means that producers are at the bottom of every food chain. If there were no producers, there would be no food.
'When you destroy a blade of grass,
You poison England at her roots:
Remember, no man's foot can pass
Where evermore no green life shoots'
no
producers cannot survive without consumers because the amount of producers would go up and they would finish their food and then die of starvation.
No, we cannot survive without plants for long Reasons:- 1.Plants give us oxygen to breathe 2. Plants are the basic producers of energy(food). no.
They are consumers because they do not make there own
Food chains and food webs are representations of the predators and prey relationships between species within an ecosystem or habitat.most food chain start on plants cause they are autotrophs they can make their own food
You cannot survive without her.
A fox is a consumer since it cannot produce its own food.
Giraffes cannot survive without water
We cannot survive without water for three day
We cannot survive without water for three day
Birds do not produce energy from sunlight, so they cannot be producers. All animals are consumers.
You need energy to survive, so you cannot survive without energy.
Most producers make oxygen during photosynthesis.