Assuming that the knight was reproductively capable (i.e. he suffered no serious injuries to his groin region or was not naturally sterile), there was no impediment to a knight having a family and children.
Some medieval knights married, and some did not. There were monastic orders, whose knights took vows just like other monks. But aside from them, knights were pretty much free to marry as they chose, except for constraints that might be imposed by kings and so forth, who might have intended specific wives for them for some reason (unlikely) or made sure they did not marry specific women, such as princesses, who would have been intended for other kings.
They technically could, I mean but they werent allowed to get married so any kids they had would be illegitimate. Naturally since they didnt have paternity tests they would be pretty safe unless they were ratted out by the kids mom. Who probably would not be believed so like I said they were pretty safe.
Yes, they were married and had children. Knights were nobles and nobles were knights. Only nobles could be knights. Often the male children became knights as well.
Of course
Yes, there were knights.
No.
no
knights and peasants
No. They had messengers to do that.
Nothing, they could take out anyone in 1 vs 1
There were knights at all places in medieval times.
Yes, there were knights.
There were knights at all places in medieval times.
They could play many instruments. They could be blacksmiths. They could be Lords. They could be jailers. They could be knights or squires.
Medieval Times
Medieval knights lived mainly in Europe. Europe was the center of medieval chivalry and feudalism, where knights served as armored warriors supporting monarchs and nobles in battles and tournaments.
it could go through a knights armor from 30 feet away
knights
no
okay
no