NO
yes. they help humans food grow which helps the humans by not starving them. Without food humans could not live.If your thinking about animals, animals need plants too, so without plants humans could not live.
Yes, there are a number of plants that are toxic if ingested and also animals that can be dangerous to humans.
Humans themselves do not use photosynthesis, but because humans depend on plants, as well as other animals that eat plants, in order to live, no, humans could not live without photosynthesis. Unless plants had another way to make food for themselves, humans could not live without photosynthesis.
air is very important for animals and plants and humans for breathing in humans and animals and for photosynthesis in plants .
No, because the plants depend on the sun, the animals depend on the plants, we depend on both the animals and the plants. Der.
Plants and animals are fundamental to ecological balance. Plants could exist without animals but animals could not live without plants. Without animals plants would eventually stabilise to a new level of ecological equilibrium.
No because animals eat plants so if animals didnt eat plants the plants would die unless watered.
If the eruption was large enough to blot out the sun for a long time, the plants would die. Without plants to feed on, there would be no animals, and ultimately no humans !
Yes. Mankind could not survive without them.
meat for any animals they could catch, fish and plants
Humans do not play a direct role in photosynthesis. Animals consume plants (or plant-eating animals) to obtain the energy produced during photosynthesis. Plants use sunlight, water, and carbon dioxide to make glucose, which is used as energy by both plants and animals.
It causes damage to buildings and infrastructure,animals,plants and humans.