No. The rulings of the Supreme Court represent the final interpretation of a law. The only way to change the interpretation is to change the law, which is the job of the legislative branch.
The precedence of declaring an act of Congress unconstitutional and subject to Judicial Review was set.
November 13, 1956 the Supreme Court affirmed the ruling in Browder v. Gayle that the bus segregation laws in Montgomery Alabama were unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment.
Yes, in the 70's. The ruling was later overturned.
Alabama’s segregation laws were unconstitutional.
The Executive branch
No the Congress can not nullify a ruling of the Supreme Court. The Congress would have to rewrite the law which the Supreme Court had declared unconstitutional. Then the new law could overrule the Supreme Court IF the new law was declared constitutional if/when appealed.
The original ruling was in 1997 (DeRolph v. State of Ohio) In 2000, 2001, and 2002, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled again that the school-funding process in Ohio remained unconstitutional. Thus far, the state legislature has ignored the Ohio Supreme Court's ruling.
The president has certain measures that he can take to make the court's decisions less effective, but in general, the president does not have authority over the federal courts and is bound, like the average citizen, to their rulings.
He ignored the Court's ruling (Apex)
Marbury vs. Madison
the 1954 Supreme Court ruling the made segregation unconstitutional
It can invalidate a law if it violates the United States Constitution.