No. Cells are the structural and functional unit of all living organisms. They are the building blocks of life. Everything living has to have a MINIMUM of 1 cell.
without a unbalanced diet you could get a life disease
Mitosis is the process of cell duplication, without it our bodies could not grow or replace what is lost (such as skin cells and blood cells) and life could not exist.
Life wouldn't be without cells. Cells are living and make up living organisms.
Life wouldn't be without cells. Cells are living and make up living organisms.
Most chemical reactions within cells could not take place without water
Muscle cells (including cardiac and smooth muscle cells) function by way of contraction. Without muscles, the body would not be able to do anything, and a person could not maintain life.
No.
Most chemical reactions within cells could not take place without....WATER! water also helps cells keep their size and shape and keeps the temperature of cells from changing rapidly
The parrot could not fly without muscle cells because they have different types of muscles than we do.
That is an interesting question because in many ways cells and life are almost synonymous. What I mean by that is the almost universal agreement among biologists is that the basic unit of life is a cell. And so, if there was anything without cells, then it would not be considered alive.
Drinkable water is essential to human life. People could not survive without it. Water carries nutrients to the cells and removes toxins. It lubricates the body.
No, cells are the blueprint of life. We are made up of cells, every living thing is. Life began with cells, if we take them away, we are nothing since out entire body is made of them.