0
Criminal liability does not depend on a specific state of mind or intent. True or false?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
true
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are offenses that do not require the defendant's criminal intent?
Strict liability offenses do not require the defendant to have criminal intent, meaning they can be found guilty regardless of their mental state. Examples include traffic violations and some environmental crimes where the focus is on the action itself rather than the intent behind it.
What are the degrees of mental fault?
Strict liability, negligence, recklessness, general intent, specific intent
Is there criminal liability for destruction of a document with the intent to impede a criminal investigation?
Yes, it would fall under 'obstruction of justice'.
How do you outline concept of criminal intent?
concept of criminal intent
Adam is charged with the commission of a crime To find criminal liability most crimes require?
Not "most," --- ALL crimes require only two elements to be proven in a court of law. (1) a criminal act, accompanied by a (2) criminal intent.
Does intent have to be there for crimInal trespassing?
If it is a misdemeanor or a felony, one must have criminal intent to be guilty.
What identify the specific elements of a crime?
There are two elements necessary to produce a criminal offense> (1) a criminal act accompanied by (2) a criminal intent. Those are the only elements necessary.
What has the author P J H M Brouns written?
P. J. H. M. Brouns has written: 'Opzet in het wetboek van strafrecht' -- subject(s): Criminal intent, Criminal liability
Elements of Criminal liability?
I have written a piece regarding this issue. Please follow the link below for a full discussion. In short, it takes criminal intent, a prohibited act and no legal justification. The long answer will be found in the link.
When a person desires to engage in certain criminal conduct or to cause a certain criminal result is the definition of what term?
The term for the desire to engage in criminal conduct or cause a certain criminal result is "specific intent." It refers to the intention or purpose behind the actions of the individual, distinguishing it from crimes that only require general intent or recklessness.
Must there be criminal intent or criminal negligence to prosecute as a crime?
A criminal act accompanied by a criminal intent is necessary to form a crime. Criminal NEGLIGENCE is a finding in civil and tort cases and is not a criminal element.
Specific intent is intent to do the criminal act?
Specific intent (also known as dolus specialis) is an intent (mens rea) which goes beyond the constituant (physical) elements of the crime (the actus reus). For example genocide is considered to be an offence of specific intent; for a person to be found responsible for genocide they must not only commit on of the constituant acts (eg. extermination) but they must do so with the specific intent to destroy in whole or in part the victimised group. This differs from the intent required for most crimes eg. assault where there is a mens rea (intent) requirement but the intent required relates solely to performing the physical acts (actus reus) involved. Crimes of specific intent cannot be commited recklessly and in some jurisdictions cannot be committed while intoxicated.
