No, light is not the absence of darkness. Darkness is nothing, light is something.No, light is not the absence of darkness. Darkness is nothing, light is something.No, light is not the absence of darkness. Darkness is nothing, light is something.No, light is not the absence of darkness. Darkness is nothing, light is something.
In the absence of light darkness prevails
No. Darkness is the relative absence of light.
No. Darkness is not a thing in and of itself; it is simply the relative absence of light.
Darkness is only the absence of light. The 'speed of darkness', or the speed at which darkness 'propagates' (even though only the absence of photons is propagating) is therefor equal to the speed of light.
Darkness is the absence of light and will therefore travel at the speed of light (6x108m/s)
you can't!!
Some say the absence of light creates it.
Someone told me that the word dark came frm night. Any responses or comments on that.
Light does not push back darkness. Darkness is not a thing unto itself that can be pushed. It is simply the relative absence of light.
"In the absence of light, darkness triumphs."(However, luci should be lucis and vinciuntshould be vincunt. As it stands, the Latin actually says "in the absence for light, darkness binds".)
Because white is the absence of darkness and black is the absence of light. They compliment one another.