Light
No, light is not the absence of darkness. Darkness is nothing, light is something.No, light is not the absence of darkness. Darkness is nothing, light is something.No, light is not the absence of darkness. Darkness is nothing, light is something.No, light is not the absence of darkness. Darkness is nothing, light is something.
In the absence of light darkness prevails
No. Darkness is not a thing in and of itself; it is simply the relative absence of light.
Darkness is only the absence of light. The 'speed of darkness', or the speed at which darkness 'propagates' (even though only the absence of photons is propagating) is therefor equal to the speed of light.
Absence of color, absence of light, darkness, the opposite of white.
Darkness is the absence of light and will therefore travel at the speed of light (6x108m/s)
you can't!!
Some say the absence of light creates it.
Darkness does not actually travel. When we perceive it as moving, it is the absence of light that is spreading. Light can be blocked or absorbed, creating darkness, but darkness itself does not have a speed at which it travels.
Dark is an adjective used to describe the absence of light, while darkness is a noun that refers to the state or quality of being without light. So, dark is the characteristic of an object or place, while darkness is the concept of absence of light.
Someone told me that the word dark came frm night. Any responses or comments on that.
"In the absence of light, darkness triumphs."(However, luci should be lucis and vinciuntshould be vincunt. As it stands, the Latin actually says "in the absence for light, darkness binds".)