Proponents of the Death Penalty will argue that it is beneficial for at least two reasons. The first is that it prevents any further crimes from being committed by the alleged perpetrator. The second is that it serves as a strong deterrent to those considering indulging in violent (or other serious) crimes: the potential penalty of death will lead many such persons to choose not to commit offenses.
anti- death penalty i am a anti death penalty... because death penalty is not a human punishment..
If caught in the US and tried for treason, yes they get the death penalty because of the US constitution
Probably because the death penalty is still on the books in NY state.
In those places that have a death penalty, it is legal because it is established by the appropriate legislature and upheld by the appropriate courts.
No amendment "challenges" the death penalty. The 8th Amendment has been used as a legal basis for challenging the constitutionality of the death penalty. The argument is that the 8th Amendment prohibits "cruel and unusual punishment" and that the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment and therefore is prohibited by the US Constitution. This argument was successful in earlier cases, not because the death penalty itself was cruel and unusual but because of the way it was administered. The death penalty is allowed if it is administered without racial or ethnic bias and in a non-cruel manner.
For. If most of the citizens in Texas did not want the death penalty, there would be no death penalty.
Now, no death penalty in Romania.
No,the state of Nebraska does not have the death penalty.
no, you dont die with the death penalty
No,the state of Missouri does not have the death penalty.
Because that is what those in power have decided.
To even the punishment for the act of the crime. For example if the someone was killed the killer would get the deathe penalty because the penalty is equal to the action.