They are called precedents. If the decision was made by a court with jurisdiction over a lower court, they are called binding precedents because the lower court is required to apply the same reasoning in similar cases under the doctrine of stare decisis.
They are called precedent cases or authorities
The decisions are called precedents. Precedents are used as a guide by future court cases with similar fact patterns.
The decisions are called precedents. Precedents are used as a guide by future court cases with similar fact patterns.
Appellate Courts
No. The decisions of the Texas Supreme Court are binding on trial courts in Texas. That is why it is called the Supreme Court.
No, the Supreme Court reviews decisions of lower (inferior) courts under its appellate jurisdiction.
A judicial review.
A judicial review.
About 1 4 th of the supreme courts decisions concern appeals from District Courts
The Court of Appeals.
Stare decisis is the guiding principle for courts that makes decisions predictable and consistent.
Each court that publishes decisions (appellate courts and a handful of trial courts) has an official court reporter publication where the decisions can be found. Private companies, such as Lexis Nexis, often buy the rights and reprint the decisions with annotations (comments).
makes legal decisions on the basis of earlier decisions by other courts
No, the principle of stare decisis, which means to stand by things decided, is relevant in the hierarchy of courts. Lower courts are usually bound to follow the legal precedents set by higher courts within their jurisdiction. This helps ensure consistency and predictability in the law.