MOM
They were in favor of a federal executive of more than one person.A federal executive of more than one person
One major question that did not surface during the debates of the Constitutional Convention regarding the executive branch was whether the U.S. should have a monarchy. The delegates were primarily focused on issues such as the structure of the executive (single vs. plural executive), the method of election, the powers and limits of the executive, and the length of the presidential term. The idea of a monarchy was generally rejected, as the delegates sought to create a system that balanced power and prevented tyranny.
The delegates decided that they wanted a legislature where every state has an equal number of votes, namely the Senate. They also wanted one where votes are proportional to population, namely the House of Representatives.
All of the men who wrote the constitution had lived under a monarchy and they didn't fight to have another one rule their lives. They wanted to ensure that the government was on dominant by one office or branch.
They wanted a stronger national currency
They wanted a stronger national currency
They wanted a stronger national currency
Not just the "executive." One of the titles for the president is the "Chief Executive," and another is the "Commander in Chief."
Leaving more power with the states
Opponents believed having a single executive was just like having one king.
A federalist was a person who want power removed from the states to the national government, wanted the three branch government style that we use today, wanted a single person to head the the executive branch, and also wanted the US Constitution to pass and go into effect, an anti-federalist was a person who wanted political powers to stay within the states, wanted the legislature to have more power than the executive branch, feared of one leader for the executive branch, because he might try to become a king or tyrant, wanted a Bill of Rights to be added to the constitution, this did happen, and wanted the constitution changed before it passed; these views were argued over from about 1787-1790.
To understand this, you must first think about the American Revolution. Americans had just fought a war for their Independence from a monarchy. The Founding Fathers would be hesitant to institute a one-person executive because it would look dangerously similar to another king. They would take every precaution to avoid anything that resembled a monarchy.