disenfranchise
It outlawed discriminatory voting practices against African Americans. Some states had previously excluded legitimate black voters by means of a literacy test, etc. This became unlawful with the Voting Rights Act which forbade any and all discriminatory qualifications.
Non-rescindable means something is permanent, and cannot be taken away. Right of way access gives someone privileges to legally cross one's property. So non-rescindable right of way access gives people permanent privileges to cross someone else's property legally.
Right's are special privileges the government gives you.
"Suffrage" refers to the right to vote, while "franchise" can encompass broader rights and privileges beyond voting, such as the right to own property or run for office. In the context of voting rights, suffrage and franchise are often used interchangeably to refer to the right to participate in elections.
Taking away someone's right to vote is to disfranchisethem.
The Minor vs Happerset ruling was based on an interpretation of the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court readily accepted that Minor was a citizen of the United States, but it held that the constitutionally protected privileges of citizenship did not include the right to vote.
The mass media could possibly hinder someone from voting by the amount of ads that are shown on television, or promotional things that they see online. Some people could get overwhelmed, and without knowing the right candidate, simply refuse to vote.
That is the correct spelling of the word "privilege" (prerogative, honor).
Hmm...how will they fit in the voting booth...can they read the questions...and how on Earth will they hold the pencil, pull the lever...will they say neigh to everything because they can't say yes?
The constitution provides for voting all ready. It is a RIGHT and if someone doesn't use the right frankly they have no right to complain about the outcome of an election. They gave away their right pure and simple. In this last election 42% didn't vote so if they had wanted a different outcome they should have voted.
1965
in which possess does voting right system fall?