When you are asked to describe a time when you have presented a persuasive argument to a group of people which resulted on a mutual satisfactory outcome, you can use something personal. It can be something as simple as persuading a group to vacation where you wanted to go.
they played xbox
If your sister threw you out of the house because you two had an argument over money, you only have two options. One is leave and never talk to her again or two, try to make up with your sister.
Describe Vasco Da Gama voyage to india.What did he and his sailors discover
Broken collarbones broken spines
The East-West Schism - APEX
The Totten clan agreed in ratifying the constitution they immigrated from Scotland to the Americas for hope. This resulted with many followers
They had a fight in 2008 at a school disco in R&R.It resulted in Jane and Tanya also having an argument as Tanya said that Lucy was a bad influence on Lauren.
You are outlining the bare bones of the argument. For example 'the ship sank due to stormy weather' would be a skeleton argument. It does not dissect in detail why a ship would sink i.e. Due to an inexperienced captain, who had little knowledge of the area and weather conditions, the ship collided with rocks and damaged the hull, which resulted in the ship taking on more water rendering the ships buoyancy redundant thus causing the sinking of the ship. This is adding more flesh to the case. Usually a skeleton argument is the bare indisputable facts.
It doesn't really explain it as describe it. Think of the universe as sort of the smoke and debris that resulted from a massive explosion.
Resulted in. For example, "His drinking problem resulted in his arrest."
An unethical investigator would be only one of many reasons for a problem with a case presented at trial. A list of reasons would fill a text book. However, if an unethical investigator was the cause, any evidence that resulted from the unethical behavior would probably be excluded from court. That does not always mean the end of the case, there could still be enough legitimate evidence that can be presented in court.
In the myth of Romulus and Remus, it was Romulus who won the argument about where to settle, leading to the founding of Rome. After a dispute over the location, Romulus chose the Palatine Hill, while Remus favored the Aventine Hill. This disagreement ultimately resulted in Remus's death at the hands of Romulus, solidifying Romulus's claim to the new city.