they used gorilla war fare. this fighting technique is when you use your surroundings and hide. then you hit the enemy from the side.
with the French's help and guerrilla tactics
same as all the other battles
The colonists used tactic we would now call guerrilla warfare tactics. They thought of their tactics as doing what worked when fighting the Native Americans, who also fought that way. The colonists hid behind trees and stones and waited for the British troops. Then the colonists would fire and retreat a small bit, then fire again and repeating this many times. Around 1500 out of 5000 British troops were killed and only around 100 of the colonies were shot.
The Roman army was so successful in executing their battle tactics due to their discipline. They held their ground in situations where the enemy would break and run. Training, discipline and the will to win were all ingredients in an army's victory.
The Battle of Trafalgar off the coast of Spain in 1805.Nelson seldom fought in a conventional straight line formation. In each of his major battles his tactics varied, and the question of whether or not he fought in a line is debated among historians -
which tactics were successful and which and were not in battle of fort sumter
Actually it's a widely believed myth that guerrilla fighting provided a winning advantage to the Colonists. The tactics used to fight the Indians were quite different from those of fighting massed European armies. Our use of the tactics learned in fighting Indians (guerrilla tactics) inflicted many casualties upon the British, but if did not win battles. It wasn't until the Continental Army mastered the art of 18th century warfare -- standing in ranks and trading volleys and finally capturing the battle field at bayonet point, did we start winning battles.
They won battles because they had such a huge amount of solidiers and good tactics :)
by the settlment
with the French's help and guerrilla tactics
fighting battles gives you ap
you mean why do you think the colonists were able to win early battles against a more experienced better equipped army? and the answer is (The reason why the colonists would win a more experienced and better equipped army is because that the colonists were fighting in wars for a larger amount of time than the better and more equipped soldiers.)
same as all the other battles
In Mao's writings in 1936, as he was battling with the Japanese army, he borrowed tactics from the Napoleonic era and also tactics used in the US Civil War. He made use of exterior and interior lines for his battles against the invading Japanese army.
they tried to kill the colonists by using guns and shooting
The Chaos Blade, which you receive in one of the last battles in Muround.
The colonists used tactic we would now call guerrilla warfare tactics. They thought of their tactics as doing what worked when fighting the Native Americans, who also fought that way. The colonists hid behind trees and stones and waited for the British troops. Then the colonists would fire and retreat a small bit, then fire again and repeating this many times. Around 1500 out of 5000 British troops were killed and only around 100 of the colonies were shot.