the biggest is the extermination of a race/religion their main goal was to exterminate Jews. Another is concentration camps. they were hell on earth. hundreds of people died each day in concentration camps.
The American and European allies' responses to the Holocaust during World War II were marked by significant inaction and delayed intervention. Despite receiving reports about the atrocities occurring in Nazi-occupied Europe, the Allies focused primarily on military objectives rather than humanitarian efforts. It wasn't until later in the war that efforts were made to rescue Jewish refugees or bombard extermination camps, and even then, these actions were limited. After the war, the full extent of the Holocaust was revealed, prompting a global reckoning and a commitment to prevent such atrocities in the future.
At the Nuremberg trial, the Allies prosecuted high-ranking officials of Nazi Germany for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and other atrocities committed during World War II. The trial established key principles for holding individuals accountable for such crimes, regardless of their official position.
No. The two countries are in de jure state of war. North Korea holds special contempt for Japan because of the atrocities committed by the Japanese against Koreans for which Japan has never apologized.
Yes because Hitler betrayed his former allies and troops committed atrocities during invasion. The US allowed USSR into Berlin first to take advantage of their anti-German sentiment
After World War II, some of the Allies committed atrocities, including the forced displacement and expulsion of millions of ethnic Germans from Eastern Europe, which often involved violence and deprivation. Additionally, the firebombing of cities like Dresden and the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki raised ethical concerns regarding civilian casualties. The treatment of German prisoners of war in camps, where some faced starvation and harsh conditions, also drew criticism. These actions highlighted the complexities and moral ambiguities of wartime justice and post-war policy.
Anne Frank described the invading Allies as liberators who brought hope and relief to the persecuted Jews in hiding, as well as other oppressed groups. She was grateful for their arrival and saw them as a sign of freedom from the tyranny of the Nazis.
The Allies [Britain, France, China, Russia, the US] defeated the Axis [Germany, Italy, Japan] powers. I do not think they would appreciate being called Outlaws, since it was the Axis that committed atrocities, including attempting genocide, in WWII.
Key reasons include these:'The world' was at war; communications were severely disrupted and movement was restricted. There was no question of sending in observers to find out 'what was really going on'.At first the British and U.S. governments were skeptical about the reports of genocide that they received.The Holocaust took place in areas that were largely inaccessible to the Allies, for example, in Nazi occupied Poland.The Allies' overriding objective was to win the war, and intervening to stop the Holocaust or other atrocities was seen as a distraction.In other words, I don't any theory is need to explain the Allies' position on this.
The term of "Allies" was the most often used term to describe the coalition of countries opposed to the Axis powers. Another similar term was "allied forces". Each term means the same thing.
Allies are helpers.The Allies were that group of Nations that stood in opposition to the Axis in WWII.
There isn't a specific name that is used to describe the axis defense against the invasion. The Axis and Allies fought during World War II.
South Korea's Allies: The whole U.N. North Korea's Allies: China and Russia