The soldiers in the war experienced hardness and sadness because they didn't get there wife and child or children.
Answer:
The trench warfare of World War One had lots of experiences for the soldiers on both sides. Sadness and loneliness were the comparatively good parts:
Trench warfare was a dirty, uncomfortable form of warfare due to the constant exposure of soldiers to the natural elements as well as to the frequent cannon bombardments and sniper fire delivered by the enemy. The defense had the advantage; however, prevailing strategic ideas emphasized offense, so attacks were frequently made at great cost to the attackers. After weeks and months, then years, of being in the trenches, soldiers not only developed many physical maladies; they also suffered emotionally and even spiritually, sometimes being unable to fulfill their duties, as a result.
There is no question that trench warfare is exceptionally horrible, and all soldiers who were in the trenches did not enjoy the experience.
I'm assuming this was supposed to say "trench" warfare, which was the warfare in WW1 in which soldiers dug trenches 8-9 feet deep in order to protect themselves from harms way.
Trench warfare began use in World War 1. In the early 1900's.
in WW1 the soldiers dug trenches (ditches) and lived down there and the land between was no mans land. trench foot is where your foot gets so wet and so cold from being in the trenches that it gets big and swollen and it usually gets so bad that it needs to be amputated
The defender just sits in the trenches since there is no need to push on the enemy trenches. The enemy has to send soldiers down through the dead zone/no man's land where all or most will get shot down by soldiers firing from the defender's trenches or by artillery fire. In fact, many British and American soldiers died this way when arrogant generals with no trench warfare experience sent squads after squads of men to die rushing the defender trenches. The defender also has the benefit of being more prepared for the trench warfare with more time to plan trench design, better supply stocks and delivery routes. For trench design, the defender can create trenches on high ground which is a critical tactical advantage over the attacker and very difficult to break.
There is no question that trench warfare is exceptionally horrible, and all soldiers who were in the trenches did not enjoy the experience.
A hole in the wall of a trench soldiers sleep in them.
I'm assuming this was supposed to say "trench" warfare, which was the warfare in WW1 in which soldiers dug trenches 8-9 feet deep in order to protect themselves from harms way.
Trench warfare began use in World War 1. In the early 1900's.
in WW1 the soldiers dug trenches (ditches) and lived down there and the land between was no mans land. trench foot is where your foot gets so wet and so cold from being in the trenches that it gets big and swollen and it usually gets so bad that it needs to be amputated
The defender just sits in the trenches since there is no need to push on the enemy trenches. The enemy has to send soldiers down through the dead zone/no man's land where all or most will get shot down by soldiers firing from the defender's trenches or by artillery fire. In fact, many British and American soldiers died this way when arrogant generals with no trench warfare experience sent squads after squads of men to die rushing the defender trenches. The defender also has the benefit of being more prepared for the trench warfare with more time to plan trench design, better supply stocks and delivery routes. For trench design, the defender can create trenches on high ground which is a critical tactical advantage over the attacker and very difficult to break.
The trenches developed for many reasons. Firstly warfare was dangerous and ' no mans land' was dangerous. Also the food soldiers ate was manly cheddar cheesel. they used to boil it in a pan and mix in roar pasta
fighting in trenches
Gas masks were developed to protect from the new gas warfare. Widespread use of trenches. Neither was terribly effective.
Trench warfare caused a lot of problems for soldiers. Experts believe up to one third of the war causalities occurred in the trenches. Furthermore, for those who lived, it was a filthy, unhygienic, and terrifying experience.
I assume the question is about the trenches used in World War I? Both sides of the conflict reached a stalemate and dug protective trenches. The number of soldiers killed and maimed (on both sides) was tremendous and proved the futility and waste of warfare, as frontal attacks moved the front back and forth.
Trench Warfare. :)