0
Describe what scientists now know about Earth that would have answered the scientists who rejected Wegener's theory?
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What do scientists now know about earth that would have answered the scientists who rejected wegeners theory?
the sea-floor spreading, and the movement of tectonic plates
When scientists rejected the continental drift were they using the scientific process?
No, because the scientists did not have a hypothesis
What was Alfred Wegner's theory and why was it rejected?
Alfred Wegner theory was rejected for a reason. This is because he didnt have enough information to prove that he is correct
Why was the hypothesis about the super continent Pangaea rejected?
there wern't enough facts
The continental drift hypothesis was rejected because Alfred wegener could not?
Because Alfred Wegener couldn't specify the mechanism responsible for the movement of the continents, the continental drift hypothesis was rejected. This theory is now accepted science.
What do scientists now know about earth that would have answered the scientists who rejected wegeners theory?
the sea-floor spreading, and the movement of tectonic plates
What was the reason wegeners continental drift hypothesis was rejected?
His evidence was incorrect.
The scientist of wegeners should have rejected his idea?
no because then they would know least about the world
Why most geologists rejected Alfred wegeners idea of continental drift?
dont ask me freak
Why was Wegener's hypothesis reject?
Alfred Wegener couldn't describe how the plate tectonics moved. So, scientists rejected his hypothesis.
What was the main reason wegeners continental drift was rejected?
He could not provide a wholly acceptable explanation for the movement of the continents.
When scientists rejected the continental drift were they using the scientific process?
No, because the scientists did not have a hypothesis
What happens if scientists detect biased data?
The study is rejected.
What is it called when scientists state whether there data confirmed or rejected the hypothesis?
findings/conclusion
What it called when scientists state whether their data confirm or rejected the hypothesis?
Stating a conclusion.
Who were redi and Pasteur?
two scientists from the 19th century that rejected the idea of spontaneous generation.
Why is a hypothesis that is unsupported by observation rejected by scientists?
Simply put, because there is not enough evidence to support it. "Rejected by scientists" should not be taken to always mean "scientist believe it is impossible" - rather, consistent evidence that support the hypothesis has not been produced.
